There is a letter in this weeks AP from a Nikon user who is thinking about going full frame and wondering if his existing lenses are suitable. He has a 16-85 afs DX, another dx which I forget what it was, and a 70-300 FX. Their answer was that they would all be OK on a D600, but that the two DX models would still be subject to the 1.5 crop and the 70-300 would be fine as it is designated FX.
Am I missing something here? I thought that the 1.5 crop factor was to do with the smaller sensor size on DX bodies, and that that therefore DX lenses were not suitable on full frame models as they were not big enough to cover the sensor, or have I got it totally wrong.
I only ask as I too have a 16-85, a 35 1.8, and a 70-300, and I thought that only the latter would be ok if I could ever afford to go full frame.
Am I missing something here? I thought that the 1.5 crop factor was to do with the smaller sensor size on DX bodies, and that that therefore DX lenses were not suitable on full frame models as they were not big enough to cover the sensor, or have I got it totally wrong.
I only ask as I too have a 16-85, a 35 1.8, and a 70-300, and I thought that only the latter would be ok if I could ever afford to go full frame.