MARK AMIES
funnier than Les Dennis
- Messages
- 1,667
- Edit My Images
- No
Another interesting article with some bearing for photographers - http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/woman/4080616/The-lucrative-new-trend-in-cyber-begging.html
This is called crowdsourcing. The BJP have run some articles on their website about it in the past.
No money isn't the same as free, if the two parties receive something that is of value to them then neither party is doing whatever they're doing for free. The dancer gets her photos and the photographer gets some practice and some portfolio work, either of them could "make it" by starting from this arrangement and neither of them owes the other anything if they do "make it".
What the good of the photographer getting some portfolio work together,if no one going to paid him
Amazing. You couldn't make it up.I needed to convert a temperature the other day so I put into Google "convert 500 f to c" (I'm sure it used to work). It took me to a site where somebody had asked the question and the crowd had guesses at the answer. You could vote for the one you though "most accurate".
Why should she pay the photographer?
If you posted this thread on a modelling forum they'd slag the photographer off for getting models for free instead of booking a paid model and would be asking if the photographer was going to remember the dancer who modelled for free if they become a successful photographer.
Value went both ways, life isn't all about money.
Why should she not paid the photographer,after all she getting her portfolio to get work,in which case I guess she would like to earn a living.
Or to you is Photographty such a low art,that photographer don't deserve getting paid for work they are do.
Why should anyone on these forums not pay a professional model? Or do we hold them in such low esteem.....
Works both ways.
Why should she not paid the photographer,after all she getting her portfolio to get work,in which case I guess she would like to earn a living.
Or to you is Photographty such a low art,that photographer don't deserve getting paid for work they are do.
Slightly OT but it still works in Google, just typed in 500f in c and got back 260 degrees celsiusI needed to convert a temperature the other day so I put into Google "convert 500 f to c" (I'm sure it used to work). It took me to a site where somebody had asked the question and the crowd had guesses at the answer. You could vote for the one you though "most accurate".
Slightly OT but it still works in Google, just typed in 500f in c and got back 260 degrees celsius
Why should she not paid the photographer,after all she getting her portfolio to get work,in which case I guess she would like to earn a living.
Or to you is Photographty such a low art,that photographer don't deserve getting paid for work they are do.
Yep it does,but then again I would paid an professional model,and expect to,after all they having a living to make as well![]()
The dancer is giving something to the photographer - being there to be shot
The photographer is giving something to the dance - taking the pictures
BOTH BENEFIT
If they agreed on this beforehand then thats the end of it and they should both be happy full stop.
How do you get a portfolio either as a model or photographer, when you are not in a position to pay for others services?
If I want to test a lens, I can get a model to do TFP. She gets shots for her portfolio, I get to test my lens. If she turns out to be the next Kate Moss, I can then make by selling the images of her at the start of her career.
The barter system preceded money
It's in the Sun so, obviously, is beneath contempt.
Ok, how about this then.. I want to shoot a slayer gig because I like slayer and photography so I offer a mag my time to do it. They file the accreditation and I give them some shots, the rest go in my portfolio and the gig goes on my cv.
As do another ten gigs...
Am I doing an apprenticeship like "old days" or am I killing photography as a trade?
So many current Tp thread subjects merge to one thing...
PS I am available for slayer gigs this week ;-)
cowasaki said:They're very loud though.
I guess if you want to work for free,it's up to you.
But as an ex pro,time & time again I get asked if I will do photos for people for various things,I tell them if the photographer that are importent to them,to go find a full time pro,who will do a good job,and the money will be well spent.![]()
Ok, how about this then.. I want to shoot a slayer gig
StewartR said:Amazing. You couldn't make it up.
You see THAT is a different position completely... YOU are not looking for images for your portfolio IF you were then you might well do them for free. THAT IS THE POINT!!
I briefly scanned over it, but I missed the part where they linked it to Diana Princess of Wales.As soon as I saw the link was to do with The Sun I just ignored it and moved on![]()
The concept of 'doing work for nothing' is a prerequiste these days for getting a 'proper' job - its called 'internship'. Blows me away that grads and the like are persuaded that this is the 'right' way to go and that companies actively encourage it.
treeman said:No one is talking about doing anything for free, other than some people on this thread who have chosen either not to read the original article or just decided to twist it into a different argument :bang:
No one is talking about doing anything for free, .....just decided to twist it into a different argument
Who said work for free :bang:
The dancer/model/other person poses without making a charge on the basis that they get some images.
The photographer takes the pictures without making a charge on the basis that they get someone to pose for free.
They are doing it for each other!!
This is not something that an established professional photographer is going to do because they don't need more evidence/portfolio shots.
This is ALSO not something an established professional model/dancer is going to do because they CAN charge an amateur/non established photographer.
The point is that this is something for people to do who are starting out.
You see THAT is a different position completely... YOU are not looking for images for your portfolio IF you were then you might well do them for free. THAT IS THE POINT!!
No again if I was looking for model,for my portfolio to take to someone in the hope of gaining work,I would paid professional model,to me the investment would be worth it,to paid a good model![]()
![]()
This argument always goes the same way, you're flogging a dead horse Darren. Some folk never manage to see the individual circumstances and "free" becomes a red rag to a bull.
So, you're saying that a photographer should pay a model?
You're also saying that a model should pay a photographer?
Can you see where I'm going with this?