I didn't realize how minimal the difference's are, as i've never viewed the 2 side by side like that before, quite surprising really when you consider the difference in the price, well it is to me anyway
I have both the D3 and D700. Picture quality is identical which is useful when using two cameras on the same shoot. When carying just one camera it tends to be the D700.
I'm guessing the focussing etc is a lot quicker on the D3, my D3 arrived last week and I'm amazed how much quicker to focus it is than the d300, I'm guessing this is similar to the d700?
also don't forget that if you're buying a grip, a D3 battery, and a D3 charger (to get 8fps)...the price difference from D700 to D3 gets a lot smaller... and gives you 2 cf card slots etc...and the fact that you own one of the best cameras in the world and the build quality (you could hammer in nails with the D3...), handling and small ergonomic features that you can't quantify but make it a pleasure to use.
There's no point in buying a D3 (or D3s) unless you are a professional press, sports or action photographer. It's a waste of money, the D700 will do everything you will need and costs you less and generally be better to use (smaller and lighter, also cheaper to maintain...since D3's cost more to repair. I just got a quote from Fixation for the repair of the protecter shutter thing on the rear eyepiece of one of mine for over £280).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.