- Messages
- 4,881
- Name
- mike
- Edit My Images
- No
A couple of my girls use D7200s and occasionally get an issue where it will not trigger or they get 2 or 3 very underexposed frames, anybody had similar issues?
Mike
Mike
What situation? With flash?
What does the EXIF data show?
Have they maybe set the exposure compensation to underexpose?
I've done thatby mistake
Bracketing?
I had the same problem it turned out I had a faulty sigma 150-600mm lens. Lens was replaced no problems since
My best guess would be lens contacts/communication... No ERR code when it refuses to fire?
Probably the best way forward. Its unlikely to be a fault with both cameras or both lenses but not unheard of. Like @twist says look at the settings of the images either side of the dark frames.You'll need to compare the exif of the underexposed frame to the next in the sequence that's good. Could be the lens. Both? cameras with faulty shutters, maybe but unlikely without an error.
I've had this occur before on my D7200. Was at evening event on continuous shooting mode.
Pretty sure it was my 18-200mm VR DX lens that was onboard.
First 2-3 shots of burst fine, 2-3 totally underexposed images then back to normal again.
This happened on about 3-4 burst shoots throughout the evening. Only discovered when doing PP.
Only happened at this one shoot, a very changing light situation all the same but totally baffled me at the time.
Dougie.
That is exactly what the girls are experiencing but they have been deleting those images as they go along, trying to find if any have survived their culls
Unlikely both would be intermittently faulty at the same time.
Looks like this for underexposed
1/1600s, f/3.5, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 8mm, 01/07/2018 09:09:26
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
and this for normal
1/1000s, f/5.6, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 180mm, 01/07/2018 09:07:52
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
Note the focal length of the underexposed
Sequence of 4
1/2000s, f/4.2, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 48mm, 01/07/2018 10:45:34
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
1/1250s, f/3.5, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 8mm, 01/07/2018 11:05:41
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
1/1250s, f/3.5, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 8mm, 01/07/2018 11:05:45
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
1/1250s, f/5.6, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 125mm, 01/07/2018 11:05:57
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
Weird. Logic would suggest this is some kind of contacts problem but I'm not so sure on that .........
Lets just say I'm eagerly awaiting the next firmware update for the camera.
Dougie.
Just updated on Sunday to 1.04, waiting to see if it happens again
Intend to contact Nikon about this
Mike
Not only is the focal length showing as 8mm on 28-300mm lens the aperture value is going to its widest setting at f3.5.Looks like this for underexposed
1/1600s, f/3.5, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 8mm, 01/07/2018 09:09:26
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
and this for normal
1/1000s, f/5.6, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 180mm, 01/07/2018 09:07:52
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
Note the focal length of the underexposed
Sequence of 4
1/2000s, f/4.2, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 48mm, 01/07/2018 10:45:34
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
1/1250s, f/3.5, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 8mm, 01/07/2018 11:05:41
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
1/1250s, f/3.5, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 8mm, 01/07/2018 11:05:45
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
1/1250s, f/5.6, ISO 400
Mode: A, Meter: Matrix, No Flash, Auto WB
Focal: 125mm, 01/07/2018 11:05:57
13.5MP (4,496x3,000) NIKON D7200
Did they do it before the fw update?
That's not really surprising though, is it? Getting some useful deals out of you on this thread has been like pulling teeth.Nikon asked for further details
That's not really surprising though, is it? Getting some useful deals out of you on this thread has been like pulling teeth.
Good idea to clean the contacts.
You may have to send the bodies and lenses to Nikon though.
Very odd, especially with it registering a focal length as 8mm on a 28-300mm lensGot to be a gremlin in the electronics somewhere for this to happen. Did you say you'd tried the lens on another body?
++ snipped ++ I came here to see if anybody else had similar happen and seems like I am not alone although Nikon say it is not a known fault, ++ snipped ++
In Nikon's defence, you may not be the only one with this problem but if no-one else has reported it to Nikon then it is "not a known fault" becuase they don't know about it![]()