- Messages
- 174
- Name
- Thomas
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I had a slightly unnerving experience the other day. A colleague's just bought a 600D, with the kit 18-55mm lens and a 55-250mm. We went out for a wander to talk about how to get away from shooting on auto and I was just about to explain that the later 18-55mm lenses were great because they had IS when I noticed..... his didn't.
Now I'm happy to be corrected, but I thought the earlier Canon cameras such as the 350 and 400D were provided with the 18-55 without IS, but the later bodies were provided with the 18-55mm lens with IS.
The brand new 18-55mm lens on his camera had the same pattern of ribbing on the zoom barrel as my IS version, but it look a lot cheaper finished - I was a bit surprised to be honest, as I'd presumed that they were made to a single quality etc.
Are there many examples of what appears to be 'feature stripping' going on in the lower rungs of the DSLR market? Curious if anyone else has noticed this sort of difference and if it's the kinda thing I should keep an eye out for when buying kit, especially second hand?
Cheers.
Now I'm happy to be corrected, but I thought the earlier Canon cameras such as the 350 and 400D were provided with the 18-55 without IS, but the later bodies were provided with the 18-55mm lens with IS.
The brand new 18-55mm lens on his camera had the same pattern of ribbing on the zoom barrel as my IS version, but it look a lot cheaper finished - I was a bit surprised to be honest, as I'd presumed that they were made to a single quality etc.
Are there many examples of what appears to be 'feature stripping' going on in the lower rungs of the DSLR market? Curious if anyone else has noticed this sort of difference and if it's the kinda thing I should keep an eye out for when buying kit, especially second hand?
Cheers.