- Messages
- 195
- Edit My Images
- No
I’m taking a 16day trip to US and Canada over the Xmas period, flying out next Sat 17th.
Itinerary includes New York (4days), Dallas (2 days), Vancouver (4 days, including Whistler), Toronto (2 days) and back to New York (4 more days including NewYears Eve).
Probably mostly street (so definitely Leica M), urban and rural landscapes.
I am unsure whether to go through the pain of taking LF for snowy Whistler and other landscapes. If I do commit to LF (defo with Cooke PS945, probably also Schn110, Rod180-S, Fuji450-C), I’ll take 4x5 plus 6x17 back (8x10 a heavy step too far).
Am I being too romantic and ambitious lugging that sort of gear around North America? Will I regret the decision on day2?
Alternative (more practical and sufficient?) supplementary systems in addition to the Leica (35, 50 and 90) are Hassy 203 (60-120, 120, 150, 180) and/or Contax 645 (35, 55, 140).
What would you do?
Itinerary includes New York (4days), Dallas (2 days), Vancouver (4 days, including Whistler), Toronto (2 days) and back to New York (4 more days including NewYears Eve).
Probably mostly street (so definitely Leica M), urban and rural landscapes.
I am unsure whether to go through the pain of taking LF for snowy Whistler and other landscapes. If I do commit to LF (defo with Cooke PS945, probably also Schn110, Rod180-S, Fuji450-C), I’ll take 4x5 plus 6x17 back (8x10 a heavy step too far).
Am I being too romantic and ambitious lugging that sort of gear around North America? Will I regret the decision on day2?
Alternative (more practical and sufficient?) supplementary systems in addition to the Leica (35, 50 and 90) are Hassy 203 (60-120, 120, 150, 180) and/or Contax 645 (35, 55, 140).
What would you do?