I'm doing a bit of research myself on the relationship between the size of the aperture and resultant Depth of Focus. It's all hush-hush at the minute but as soon as I've confirmed my findings I'll be going straight to the Daily Mail. Fame and fortune awaits....![]()
Sarcasm won't get you brownie points. but it is the daily fail with a load of nonsense yet again. That makes it ok![]()
Shows how bad the article is when you notice he is using a Canon camera, say no more!!!
Realspeed
I'm doing a bit of research myself on the relationship between the size of the aperture and resultant Depth of Focus. It's all hush-hush at the minute but as soon as I've confirmed my findings I'll be going straight to the Daily Mail. Fame and fortune awaits....![]()
are there any others![]()
I'm surprised they don't attempt to link this bizarre distortion phenomenon with cancer.
I'm doing a bit of research myself on the relationship between the size of the aperture and resultant Depth of Focus. It's all hush-hush at the minute but as soon as I've confirmed my findings I'll be going straight to the Daily Mail. Fame and fortune awaits....![]()
If I press it all the way down, my camera makes a funny clicking sound and then the display on the back lights up with all sorts of pretty colours. It's like I've just squeezed a whole scene into my camera...

Or nazi-terrorist-white supremacists with wooden legs who have 18 kids and are claiming benefit in eight different names. While they build a mosque. On green-belt land.
Or nazi-terrorist-white supremacists with wooden legs who have 18 kids and are claiming benefit in eight different names. While they build a mosque. On green-belt land.

I'll be interested in this as the aperture has no bearing on Depth of Focus.
It does, but not much to be fair. In my haste to post a smart @r5ed sarcastic reply I typed Focus instead of Field.
But just wait until you see what I'm about to conclude about light levels and exposure....
Seems like we have two threads running the same things (aside from the Eurozone thingy)....
http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=365159
That's nothing - I've discovered that there's this little round button on the top of my camera, next to some display thing. If I press it all the way down, my camera makes a funny clicking sound and then the display on the back lights up with all sorts of pretty colours. It's like I've just squeezed a whole scene into my camera... I'll do a full write-up soon to illustrate my findings, but I think I'm onto something here...
Just imagine if once you'd managed to trap that whole scene in your camera there was a way to get it back out again so that you could look at it at a bigger size.
Wow!!!
Just imagine if once you'd managed to trap that whole scene in your camera there was a way to get it back out again so that you could look at it at a bigger size.
That's just crazy talk.![]()
Catdaddy said:Not so fast... All you need to do is connect your camera to this special box of bits and pieces with a shiny picture window thingy using a USB cable... which, I think you'll find, stands for 'Unique Scenery Biggeriser'. Simples!
Should I get them to hold the front page?
To be fair to the OP, most DM readers wouldn't know what lenses and focal lengths were if you inserted them up their anuses (or should that be anii?)
"Photographer Stephen Eastwood has finally solved the mystery"
What you mean a portrait lens gives a better shot than a wide angle for faces.... all this time look and we never knew that, well done Stephen for putting us on the right track. Only problem is I could have told you that 40 years ago.
