Just use DS Colour Labs.
Which printer you got..I enjoy the whole process of photography, from going out with the camera, post processing, printing and framing and hanging.
I don't care if it makes financial sense to have my own printer, I just enjoy doing my own prints, it's all part of the experience for me.
Photography isn't a cheap hobby and a printer is just another part of the expense along with bodies, lenses, tripods, gear bags, filters, accessories etc, it's a hobby and I love.
So I'd say if you fancy printing your own then go for it.
Which printer you got..
I was thinking of the Canon Pro 10S but now thinking of the 100s..
Do you print alot and do you just swap print in the frames or fill the whole ha ha that what I am worried about ..
You seem to ignore the environmental footprint, which although I'm not equipped to audit it, I imagine is less for lab prints.I don't care if it makes financial sense to have my own printer, I just enjoy doing my own prints, it's all part of the experience for me.
Photography isn't a cheap hobby and a printer is just another part of the expense along with bodies, lenses, tripods, gear bags, filters, accessories, cost of going to locations etc, it's a hobby and I love it.
You're right about the hard drive. But Flickr (et al) is world-wide sharing. It's resolution-challenged, though, and what may seem lustrous on-screen may lack the size and texture of a print. Horses for courses, and there are many judgements to balance out ...I'm going to buy double sided photo paper (A4) and a photo book and start making albums for the coffee table etc. I think it's a shame to be taking so many photos and just have them buried on a hard drive or on flickr, better to have them where folk can see them.
I think this is the important bit for me. After a day out, I cull and edit down to one or two with the best getting printed. If it's not good enough to print out and admire, I got something wrong. Trick is to learn from that and improve. Getting 30 prints done by DSCL is just a bunch of photos - just like when I collected my developed films from Boots. Doing one - carefully, is very different.I now have a final product to work towards
I think this is the important bit for me. After a day out, I cull and edit down to one or two with the best getting printed. If it's not good enough to print out and admire, I got something wrong. Trick is to learn from that and improve. Getting 30 prints done by DSCL is just a bunch of photos - just like when I collected my developed films from Boots. Doing one - carefully, is very different.
My suggestion - get a second hand one and have a go. If you enjoy the process and the results, then there's your answer. If you find it frustrating, unrewarding and expensive - stick to DCSL.
Just use DS Colour Labs.
I'd really like to find some online resource that could give indicative ink costs per print
The Canon Pixma Pro has a 13ml tank for £10 which is 76p/ml. My Epson Stylus Pro has a 220ml tank for around £90 (new - but I always buy 2nd hand for under half that price) which is 40p/ml (They both use 8 carts). I think I've done a full change of all the tanks over a year of printing quite a bit. I do test prints, A2, A3+ and A4 as well as the occasional silly panorama (Grand Canyon at 12 feet). Take into account the paper cost as well as ink and it's definitely more expensive than DSCL, but I'm lucky in that my second hand 4800 was £20, & the inks I can sometimes get on eBay for silly prices.
When my wife paled at the cost of a cartridge, I pointed out how big they were compared to carts in ordinary printers and worked out the cost per ml. Every printer is going to lay down a different amount of ink, but it won't be hugely different between printers. The cost per ml though seems to be very different depending on cart size. And cart size isn't always easy to find for some printers (I wonder why?).
And then there's paper costs... I've spent a fortune finding the right papers for me. And the printer footprint... https://flic.kr/p/GeCKsV (that's a normal sized chest of drawers it's overhanging!)
But when I compare my archival giclee (lol) fine art prints to DSCL, there's no comparison - not by a mile.
The Canon Pixma Pro has a 13ml tank for £10 which is 76p/ml. My Epson Stylus Pro has a 220ml tank for around £90 (new - but I always buy 2nd hand for under half that price) which is 40p/ml (They both use 8 carts).
I have been thinking of getting a canon pro printer.. But I keep thinking would i use it enough what would I do with the prints etc..
This keeps going round me head
s that for their standard C Type prints or their archival giclee fine art prints on Permajet / Hannermule paper?
This is me too.I get a really different feeling for the images that I print on my consumer-grade (A4) Canon than those that remain on my hard drive. And getting back a bunch of images from DSCL doesn't compare. Being aware that printing is an expensive and time-consuming process makes the selection process more conscious (for me). I think more carefully about the PP, and often after an image has been on the wall for a few days I'll re-process it and print again. Flaws become clearer. I wouldn't want to print the same image several times if each had a £5 delivery charge!
Good catch - it's the former. The latter would require me to calibrate my monitor to ensure correct colours/tones etc. And then it's not a case of getting several done. DSCL don't appear to do 13x19, but their 14x20 on Hahnemule is £19+£5 delivery. Quick maths...
In the last year, home printing (very approximated):
I know I've gone through 2 boxes of 25 13x19s (A3"plus") and at least 2 boxes of A4 (50 prints) as well as at least 50 test prints on different A4 papers and various silly panos on roll proofing paper. Call it roughly 100 13x19 prints at £80/25 x 100 = £320 in paper
8 x £65 = £520 for the very estimated one cart per colour. All my carts are sourced off eBay and some (cyan, magenta & yellow) are significantly cheaper than others. Price averaged.
Total cost for 100 prints = £820
DSCL
14x20 "fine art" prints on Hahnemule paper are £19 = £1900 for their "archival" prints on Hahnemule (I don't like Permajet papers) excluding delivery. If you get them one at a time, that's getting very expensive.
A3 "standard" prints are £1.15. so that's £115. Again, ordering lots at once is much more economical.
This confirms what I thought. For bog standard 6x4s in bulk, or even "going large" with their normal paper you can't beat DSCL for cost. For fine art, you're stuck with Hahnemule or Permajet papers and if you order singly, it's more expensive than DIY. Of course there's the printer cost, footprint, and finding one that works for you. The Epson/Canon debate seems to square in the favour of Canon here, but I love my Epson.