TheAndyA Messages 1,327 Name Andy Edit My Images No 21 Jan 2015 #1 I've begun saving for my next lens and although it may take a while, I'm quite interested in the Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS. Have any of you folks used both the MK I and the MK II? Is there really much difference in image quality etc?
I've begun saving for my next lens and although it may take a while, I'm quite interested in the Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L IS. Have any of you folks used both the MK I and the MK II? Is there really much difference in image quality etc?
Gaz J Messages 3,294 Name Gary Edit My Images No 21 Jan 2015 #2 http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/510-canon_70200_2is28 This will tell you how it compares to the MK1.
http://www.photozone.de/canon_eos_ff/510-canon_70200_2is28 This will tell you how it compares to the MK1.
Seahorse Messages 337 Name Mike Edit My Images Yes 21 Jan 2015 #3 You can also check the results out at DXO Mark, which suggest the Tamron is better?
HoppyUK Messages 23,200 Name Richard Edit My Images No 21 Jan 2015 #4 Check any review you like really, they all say the MkII is significantly better. It's most noticeable at f/2.8.
Check any review you like really, they all say the MkII is significantly better. It's most noticeable at f/2.8.