Effective Aperture

AliB

Suspended / Banned
Messages
7,762
Edit My Images
No
While playing with the 105mm macro I had noticed that, on occasion, it would not go below f3. What is going on here I thought??????

So I got it out today and it would appear that the closer I got to the object I wanted to photograph, the more the lens stopped down but the DOF was still looking all nice and shallow.

Had a look in the manual.......nope, nothing....

So google being my friend I came up with a really rather good reply as to what was going on with the 105mm.

Michael R. Freeman , Jan 13, 2010; 09:42 a.m.

Basically, when you focus closer, a lens moves away from the image plane and casts a larger circle of light. But since the amount of light coming through the lens is exactly the same, but spread over a wider circle, the light intensity (effective f/stop) within that circle is now dimmer.

Take a flashlight into a dark room and hold it about 6 inches from the wall. Now move the flashlight further away from the wall. The circle of light gets larger, but dimmer. That is essentially what happens with a macro lens at close distances. ALL lenses exhibit this behavior, but with macro lenses it is much more noticeable because the extension away from the image plane is much larger. We now have "smart" cameras and lenses that will report this decrease in effective aperture (the actual aperture opening remains at f/2.8) as the lens is focused closer.

Some third party macro lenses may not show this decrease in effective aperture in the viewfinder, and may appear to give you f/2.8 at minimum focus, but in reality the exact same thing is happening and the effective aperture decreases with increased magnification.

So there you go, blooming smart lenses!

Just the thick operator who will have to learn how to use it right. :D
 
does it matter what mode you have your camera in?


Nope Joe, I had it in Manual but still it won't go below f3.2 and if I get really close to the subject it was stopping down to f4!

That's when I twigged and as soon as I focussed on a subject a distance off it went to f2.8 with no problem.

So there you go Yv another mystery solved :D
 
I think this is a Nikon thing. Canon macros still report the lowest f/number unadjusted.

It's a moot point, because technically the f/number doesn't change - it's only true when measured at infinity anyway. So what Nikon give you is an effective f/number, a transmission number or T-stop if you like.

If you focus down to 1:1 it should read two stops down, eg f/5.6, but some macros (internal focus ones) cheat and reduce the focal length as you move closer, which makes the f/number lower, so it doesn't drop by the full two stops you might expect.

It makes no difference to the exposure whatever the camera reports - the light coming through the lens is obviously reduced and that's all the metering system needs to know.
 
Back
Top