As a relative beginner I've been using my trusty 2000D for a few years. But I liked the idea of a Flip LCD screen plus other features that the 250D has, so I decided to buy one.
Although I'm generally happy with the picture quality of the 250D, I've noticed a key difference compared to the 2000D, namely Auto ISO.
I'm finding that the 250D tends to use much higher Auto ISO settings than my 2000D when taking an identical picture. More noticeable in close-up / low light conditions.
There may also be a difference in the evaluative metering between the 2000D and 250D - again only noticeable indoors.
For example, if I take a picture of a focus test chart at a distance of 2m in Av mode, the 250D tends to look washed out.
With general outdoor photography the 250D nails the exposure perfectly.
The 250D uses a more advanced processor than the 2000D. I am tending to think that the processor is designed to bump up the iso in the semi manual modes (Av and Tv).
Just wondering if anyone has experienced different Auto ISO or exposure quirks with their different cameras. Thanks for any comments or advice.
Although I'm generally happy with the picture quality of the 250D, I've noticed a key difference compared to the 2000D, namely Auto ISO.
I'm finding that the 250D tends to use much higher Auto ISO settings than my 2000D when taking an identical picture. More noticeable in close-up / low light conditions.
There may also be a difference in the evaluative metering between the 2000D and 250D - again only noticeable indoors.
For example, if I take a picture of a focus test chart at a distance of 2m in Av mode, the 250D tends to look washed out.
With general outdoor photography the 250D nails the exposure perfectly.
The 250D uses a more advanced processor than the 2000D. I am tending to think that the processor is designed to bump up the iso in the semi manual modes (Av and Tv).
Just wondering if anyone has experienced different Auto ISO or exposure quirks with their different cameras. Thanks for any comments or advice.