- Messages
- 2,497
- Name
- Andrew
- Edit My Images
- No
HI guys,
As it's a big birthday for me this year (I won't tell you how old I will be as you will make fun of me ). Anyway for my birthday, Mrs Sootchucker has booked a 4 day city break to New York City this September. I know it's a good way away, but I was wondering about the correct equipment to take. As some of you may know, I currently run two systems, my Olympus Micro Four Thirds (with the EM1-X and OM-1 bodies), and a Nikon Z system (with the Z6 II, Z7 II and Z9 bodies). I don't really have a small do it all point and shoot (other than my iPhone 13 pro).
My thoughts were either the:
OM-1 Body with my 12-100 F4, or 12-40 F2.8 lenses - and perhaps my Panny Leica 8-18 F2.8-4 for the occasional wide angle shot. or my
Z6 II (or Z7 II) body, with my Nikon Z 24-140 F4 lens and perhaps my Z 14-30 F4 ?
The Olympus kit (with both lenses) would weigh a min of 1,296g and a max of 1,475g, and the Nikon kit would weigh min 1,690g to a max of 1,820g. So with the bigger lenses there's only 345g between them.
There are pros and cons for both. Firstly the Olympus system is that 345g lighter and slightly smaller (although not that much). It also has it's hand held high res shot feature, Live ND, Live Composite modes and of course the fabulous image stabilization. For the Nikon though is obviously full frame for not that much in the way of weight and size penalty. Much better high ISO performance (for night shots), more resolution (especially if I take the Z7 II @ 46mp) better Video etc. TBH, I'm sort of coming down on the Olympus side simply for it's breath of abilities, and I think I can counter some of the low light ISO performance it gives away by using slower shutter speeds and relying on the IS (for static shots at least), and for the resolution, perhaps the HHHR feature (again for static shots) ?
I think I might be over thinking this already . One things for certain, I want to get some much better images this time which I hope to print big and have on the wall. The last time I was in NYC was 16 years ago, and at that time I took a Konica Minolta Dimage A2 camera (anyone remember those), and when I look today at those grainy 8mp slightly unsharp images, and extremely limited DR from it's 2/3" sensor of the time, I don't want to repeat that and come back with images that I look at and regret not taking a better camera, but at the same time it needs to be portable and easily carried and not have me look too much like a tourist (I know there's no way of really getting away with that, but as incognito as possible).To that end, it might have to be a new back pack too that doesn't look so much like a photo backpack (anyone recommend the Peak Design Everyday 20L backpack in grey or blue ?)
Anyone have any thoughts on this please, feel free to chime in.
As it's a big birthday for me this year (I won't tell you how old I will be as you will make fun of me ). Anyway for my birthday, Mrs Sootchucker has booked a 4 day city break to New York City this September. I know it's a good way away, but I was wondering about the correct equipment to take. As some of you may know, I currently run two systems, my Olympus Micro Four Thirds (with the EM1-X and OM-1 bodies), and a Nikon Z system (with the Z6 II, Z7 II and Z9 bodies). I don't really have a small do it all point and shoot (other than my iPhone 13 pro).
My thoughts were either the:
OM-1 Body with my 12-100 F4, or 12-40 F2.8 lenses - and perhaps my Panny Leica 8-18 F2.8-4 for the occasional wide angle shot. or my
Z6 II (or Z7 II) body, with my Nikon Z 24-140 F4 lens and perhaps my Z 14-30 F4 ?
The Olympus kit (with both lenses) would weigh a min of 1,296g and a max of 1,475g, and the Nikon kit would weigh min 1,690g to a max of 1,820g. So with the bigger lenses there's only 345g between them.
There are pros and cons for both. Firstly the Olympus system is that 345g lighter and slightly smaller (although not that much). It also has it's hand held high res shot feature, Live ND, Live Composite modes and of course the fabulous image stabilization. For the Nikon though is obviously full frame for not that much in the way of weight and size penalty. Much better high ISO performance (for night shots), more resolution (especially if I take the Z7 II @ 46mp) better Video etc. TBH, I'm sort of coming down on the Olympus side simply for it's breath of abilities, and I think I can counter some of the low light ISO performance it gives away by using slower shutter speeds and relying on the IS (for static shots at least), and for the resolution, perhaps the HHHR feature (again for static shots) ?
I think I might be over thinking this already . One things for certain, I want to get some much better images this time which I hope to print big and have on the wall. The last time I was in NYC was 16 years ago, and at that time I took a Konica Minolta Dimage A2 camera (anyone remember those), and when I look today at those grainy 8mp slightly unsharp images, and extremely limited DR from it's 2/3" sensor of the time, I don't want to repeat that and come back with images that I look at and regret not taking a better camera, but at the same time it needs to be portable and easily carried and not have me look too much like a tourist (I know there's no way of really getting away with that, but as incognito as possible).To that end, it might have to be a new back pack too that doesn't look so much like a photo backpack (anyone recommend the Peak Design Everyday 20L backpack in grey or blue ?)
Anyone have any thoughts on this please, feel free to chime in.
Last edited: