Morning all,
Currently, I have been using a Nikon 80-200 2.8 version 2 (push pull) lens for a few years now. It’s been a great workhouse and I still love the images it produces. It has been away for a service as the lube has dried up and it is starting to show its age now.
I am looking for a faster focusing telephoto zoom, sadly my budget first stretch as far as the new 70-200 fl - I tried one in the summer and was blown away by it - sensational.
Anyway - back to reality - I’m considering going for a used 80-200 two ring, the addition of the tripod collar seems useful and most importantly as the lens is still current, serviceability shouldn’t be a problem.
My question is, how much faster is the af on these lenses ?
I’m hesitant to go for the 70-200 vr I and some of the older sigma / tamron lenses due to serviceability.
Currently, I have been using a Nikon 80-200 2.8 version 2 (push pull) lens for a few years now. It’s been a great workhouse and I still love the images it produces. It has been away for a service as the lube has dried up and it is starting to show its age now.
I am looking for a faster focusing telephoto zoom, sadly my budget first stretch as far as the new 70-200 fl - I tried one in the summer and was blown away by it - sensational.
Anyway - back to reality - I’m considering going for a used 80-200 two ring, the addition of the tripod collar seems useful and most importantly as the lens is still current, serviceability shouldn’t be a problem.
My question is, how much faster is the af on these lenses ?
I’m hesitant to go for the 70-200 vr I and some of the older sigma / tamron lenses due to serviceability.