Few for critique...
- Thread starter F-Stop
- Start date
not too sure on 1, its kinda crazy, if thats what you were going for then nice one.
2 is the best of the bunch for me, although i'd like to see it slightly less processed, but i guess thats a personal thing.
3 is nice, great lighting, but the fingers look really strange, and that distracts me a bit. Worth redoing if u can, without the hand, or try and make the hand look more handlike.
2 is the best of the bunch for me, although i'd like to see it slightly less processed, but i guess thats a personal thing.
3 is nice, great lighting, but the fingers look really strange, and that distracts me a bit. Worth redoing if u can, without the hand, or try and make the hand look more handlike.
- Messages
- 8,346
- Edit My Images
- Yes
1st. If I'd taken it then it would have been by mistake, but that said it has "something" going for it, but they eyes/lighting is too stark/contrasty/wrong
2nd. Would be great if you could see a tad more face
3rd. Head needs to be a little more to the right and not cropped
2nd. Would be great if you could see a tad more face
3rd. Head needs to be a little more to the right and not cropped
OP
- Messages
- 1,124
- Name
- Ian
- Edit My Images
- Yes
1: Yeah, I usually go for a bit of crazy.
2: I tend to over process from time to time... personal taste I guess.
3: Dangit! I never really paid attention to the hands, but you are correct. She was holding the "cage" behind her, but they do look odd...
1: I agree mostly. I didn't particularly like this shot from the get go, but it grew on me... I guess it's that "something" hehe.
2: Nah, he was an ugly lad underneath. (kidding)
3: Sadly, nothing was cropped... was a chance shot as she doesn't sit still very long and only had a few moments to catch her at ease.
