The size of the large scan was mentioned upthread by Ste_S, in the discussion after ChrisR's earlier post:Looking at Flimdev's order form it doesn't give an indicative file size for their 35mm scans, just 'small', 'medium' and 'large'. Does anyone know what the typical file sizes are for their medium and large Noritsu scans?
Thanks for your infoThe size of the large scan was mentioned upthread by Ste_S, in the discussion after ChrisR's earlier post:
A 16 bit tiff of a large 30.4MP scan would be 174MB uncompressed, which is probably why FilmDev doesn't do it even if the Noritsu allows 16 bit scanning.
Thanks guys now ready to send them off having finished the roll of XP2 I had in the Trip 35 the slide film is Kodachrome 64!
I also have a unexposed roll at home too!
You won't be able to get the Kodachrome developed as colour film now, as the K14 process died off a few years ago. You can get it developed as black and white though.
I've just been reading that on AG Website can Peak or The Darkroom process this or is it just AG? I only ask As AG's website specifically mentions it but the other just mention E6 slides
No one in the world can process Kodachrome for colour slides.
You should be able to find someone willing to crossprocess as black and white, although you may need to email/phone.
No one in the world can process Kodachrome for colour slides.
It's probably at least worth talking to Kelly-Shane Fuller at Piratelogy to see if he's still offering the Kodachrome service. Here's a report from someone who used it last year:
http://quirkyguywithacamera.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/kodachrome-2017-in-color.html
http://www.piratelogy.com/
Snip:
I remember seeing this last year but I don't know if they got any further with it: https://www.popphoto.com/someone-figured-out-process-for-developing-kodachrome-film-in-color
At the moment it looks like you've only got the B&W option, unless you give it another year and see if there are any further, erm... for want of a better word... developments!
I should have specified that there is currently no one offering a K14 development service commercially.
In addition to the one you've linked to, there has been at least one other person that has managed to colour develop Kodachrome. That said, I can't really see Kodachrome coming back in any meaningful way unless reimagined as an E6 or C41 film.
Sadly, I think you're probably right, I think cost would be the main factor.
Talking of slide film, I do like the results you've had from that Cinestill film you've been using.
I'd always envisaged Cinestill as being a slide film, probably owing to its name. I'll have to read up about it. I usually use Portra 800 if I'm wanting a fast negative film these days, in the old days it was Ektar 1000 or Fuji 1600, which were both reasonably fine grained for their speed as long as they weren't underexposed. Mind you, if I wanted anything faster than 800 these days I'd probably just use my Canon 6D instead, sorry to use the 'D word' in the F&C section!
£30 a roll process paid compares favourably with the cost per shot of the reimagined Polaroid film from Impossible Project which works out £2.30 a pop.
Kodachrome was never cheap and would be pricey now with inflation so I’d happily pay £2 a shot process paid to have genuine Kodachrome back again. I wouldn’t be using it every day but for special shoots I’d invest. 4x5 colour is significantly more expensive and I wasted a lot of 4x5 film
I think that the industry needs to be careful not to stretch itself too thin and to maintain critical mass. The user base is smaller than in the past, so to bring in another film processing method in addition to the black and white, C41, and E6 processes already in place could be problematic.
...and the only reason I stopped using Kodachrome in the late 70s was moving to medium format...I've always been a bright or sunny weather shooter and so using the original Kodachrome at 25 asa\iso wasn't too annoying. With everyone now owning teles and zooms up to 300mm many lenses down to f3.5 to f5.6, with Kodachrome @ 64asa\iso would be still annoying with camera shake problems on less than a bright day.
With everyone now owning teles and zooms up to 300mm many lenses down to f3.5 to f5.6,
So nothing to do with price.
My Dad always bought a couple of rolls of Kodachrome to use when we went on holiday, so we've got a shoe-box full of memories in glorious 'technicolour'.
Well I think many people used to do this as it would be daft to use if for "everyday" film when B\W was so cheap in comparison (esp DIY).