I'd say the first two need to be 'warmed up' a bit in your RAW converter - the lighting looks really cold. Pose-wise, the third is the best - it's just a shame it's a bit soft. What was the lighting setup?
I'd agree with catdaddy on the temperature, I'm guessing that you had the camera on auto white balance as #2 doesn't look as cold and #3 looks possibly a little warm (but I'm splitting hairs)
#3 is definatly soft.
#2 & #1 are ever so slightly soft.
also I reckon that #1 & #2 are a little underexposed.
Spot high right on hair unit in brolly low right and another mid height left set by a couple of the "oldies"
Made a bit of light relief and lent camera to a 14yr lass doing GCSE who braved the club and only had a couple of frames on her 35mm. Printed her up her originals and some "shopped" prints larger and put on CD so will drop in to the school tomorrow.
I think the blur in the one with the rose looks more like camera shake to me than bad focus. It was 1/30" so Fangman was probably doing a bit of shaking!
I think the blur in the one with the rose looks more like camera shake to me than bad focus. It was 1/30" so Fangman was probably doing a bit of shaking!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.