Wouldn't it be better to address the reason for your thin negs, exposure/underdevelopment? If it's an ongoing problem.
Intensifier is not a great solution for thin negs, could you not get detail out through scanning?
Don't get me wrong, I know I've got a bigger issue to sort out but I could do with rescuing these particular negs as they were from a TFP shoot with a model.
I thought I'd got my metering problem sorted and the two other films I sent away to be processed at the same time are a bit think but definitely usable but the other two rolls in question are a joke. I'm wondering if I've got a dicky lens to contend with too.
There could be another cause in this instance too. I was using an orange filter and when I checked online for the exposure compensation there were varying answers. I took a photo of a grey card with my DSLR and then added the filter and changed the exposure until the histogram looked roughly the same. I wonder if the film responded to the filter in a different way to the DSLR:shrug:
Seeing as I'm plagued by thin negatives I picked up some chromium intensifier as part of a 3for2 at Focus on Imaging this year. Has anyone used it before? What are your experiences/tips?