I have both the S5pro & the nikon D200 and believe me the Fuji is the better camera and miles ahead of the D40this is a typical KR remark in that is sweeping and not-verified/proven
For sports and landscapes and most other things, it's worse than my Nikon D200, or even my Nikon D40.
do you agree..?
I have both the S5pro & the nikon D200 and believe me the Fuji is the better camera and miles ahead of the D40
yes, ignore rockwell and his mad lust for the D40. It's a good camera, but S5 worse than the D40? come off it... the dynamic range and picture from the S5, processed well, is fantastic.

It's awful for sports, but for landscapes or portrait work![]()
See here for an example of the S5's dynamic range....![]()

saw that - read that
guess who posted this in the "comments"...
"Just picked this camera up to use alongside my D3. Looking forward to trying it out... ".....![]()

It's lovely...hardly use it though....G.

hmmm sussed it in 3 minutes eh ?..........
dont you have a studio to paint or something, instead of spending time here...
Me and David wrote a task list today....only a partial one, I still have emails to crawl through and a digital task manager to check.....I wrote down 41 order related tasksI suspect there are in the region of 70 bits of unfinished work all kicking around. I need a slap
.
G.
ok agree with that against the D40... BUT - a dual owner - just what i wanted
now - mainly landscapes... no people, kids dogs family weddings, wildlife
D200 or Fuji S5...?
There dynamic range makes them great for landscapes and portraits..
Make that 3, I've just got hold of a minty one that has the Nikon grip to complement my D300.
interesting - which Nikon grip fits the S5 ?
The D200 one - it's the same body