GH2 or G3 and AF

Messages
991
Name
Marcia
Edit My Images
No
I used to own a G1, which was ideal for me, apart from the very slow auto focus, which meant that taking images of birds in flight was nigh on impossible.
I moved on to a Nikon D5100, which I love, but with my Rheumatoid Arthritis, I am finding it increasingly heavier to carry on a bad day.
I like to take images of birds, butterflies, dragonflies, and landscapes.
I have been reading reviews of both the G3 and the GH2, and the speed of the AF, but will it be good enough for birds in flight?
I would be looking at getting a 100-300mm lens eventually as well.
If anyone could offer me any advice I would be very grateful.
Thank you all in advance
 
Hi Marcia,

I have just gone from a G3 to a GH2.

The G3 is a fabulous 'little' camera, and gives teriffic IQ.
Controls I found, small and fiddly and there is no eye sensor to automatically switch from the EVF to the LCD and back, this used to drive me mad.

The GH2 is a larger camera with larger controls and an eye sensor, terrific.

The 100-300 is highly rated but how it handles birds in flight I can't say.

I'm very, very pleased with my GH2, you may find this of interest....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajhInoe7-iE
 
Thank you for the reply and link Dave.
The more info I can get, the better informed decision I can make!!
 
Hi there - I recently sold my entire gh2 kit 100-300 14-140 20mm 1.7 metz the whole 'shooting' match and bought a d5100 !! I was never really happy with the IQ from the 4/3 format :thumbsdown: Maybe it was my technique , i don't know , the 5100 is not a great deal larger than the gh2 (sticks out a bit more i suppose) sure it is a bit bigger http://camerasize.com/compare/#162,166 but the iq from the Nikon IMHO is a whole lot better . if you go to
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1041 there are some great images from these cams but i was never able to get the same result.
 
Hi there - I recently sold my entire gh2 kit 100-300 14-140 20mm 1.7 metz the whole 'shooting' match and bought a d5100 !! I was never really happy with the IQ from the 4/3 format :thumbsdown: Maybe it was my technique , i don't know , the 5100 is not a great deal larger than the gh2 (sticks out a bit more i suppose) sure it is a bit bigger http://camerasize.com/compare/#162,166 but the iq from the Nikon IMHO is a whole lot better . if you go to
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1041 there are some great images from these cams but i was never able to get the same result.

Thank you for the info!
I really do like my D5100, but the weight is my main problem, rather than the size.
Photography is such a minefield isn't it!!
Enjoy your D5100. It really is a great camera!
 
My husband has suggested the Olympus OM-D E-M5!!
It does look rather superb, but also probably too pricey too!! But a girl can dream! ;)
 
Nikon V1

...Proper PDAF and SLR lens compatibility. I shoot at full AF speed with an 800mm f/4 angle of view, switching between viewfinder and rear screen, in RAW. Then, when I just need 27-300mm walkarounds, I use the twin kit lenses and the lot fits in the bag space taken up by an SLR body without a lens.

The downsides are silly Auto ISO modes which I no longer use, and the price. Still, try and set up an 800mm f/4 with phase detect AF on an SLR system and see how much that might cost..

The V1 is criminally underrated
 
Nikon V1

...Proper PDAF and SLR lens compatibility. I shoot at full AF speed with an 800mm f/4 angle of view, switching between viewfinder and rear screen, in RAW. Then, when I just need 27-300mm walkarounds, I use the twin kit lenses and the lot fits in the bag space taken up by an SLR body without a lens.

The downsides are silly Auto ISO modes which I no longer use, and the price. Still, try and set up an 800mm f/4 with phase detect AF on an SLR system and see how much that might cost..

The V1 is criminally underrated

Hi Dan
Now that sounds very interesting. Have you any images you would care to share using the V1 please?
Many thanks
Marcia
 
Back
Top