Last one is probably the best, although the subject isnt really my cup o tea.
I like cars, but these aren't to my taste, but that doesn't matter as its technique etc that we're supposed to be looking at.
Try some darker car parks with less artificial lighting and see what results you get. I shot some pics of my car in my back garden with just moonlight. Was a 30 sec exposure mind.
The last picture is the best out of these in my opinion but the thing that does jump out at me is the difference of colour from the bonnet to the wing. Has it been resprayed? Artificial lighting can really make slight colour differences stand out alot more.
Are you suggesting a vectra v6 is a chavs car? lol How many chavs can afford the fuel?Wouldn't a McDonalds carpark be a more suitable setting for such cars?
Didn't realise that they were handheld photos. Pretty good going
x2 from me..
Wouldn't a McDonalds carpark be a more suitable setting for such cars?
Not that I am saying Travel Inn is *that* much more classy but...
Gosh, why don't you just call the poster a scummy little chav and be done with it.
The first and third seem to work more than the middle shot. They don't quite sparkle do they but it sounds like you're making progress in the quest for your ideal car shot. Perhaps you could try a location where you get more lights reflecting in the cars as this always shows the contours off well.
Cheers fella. Getting there, i think the D50 isn't suited to dark situations. Its failed by the iso noise really. Where you want to be using ISO800 its bad!
x2 from me..
Wouldn't a McDonalds carpark be a more suitable setting for such cars?
Not that I am saying Travel Inn is *that* much more classy but...