Mark is absolutely correct, the information comes from Creditsafe which sources the data from Companies House, The Registry Trust and the London and Edinburgh Gazette.
I stand by what I say, you don't appear to have any previous Directorships but currently have 8 current appointments (x7 Directorships and 1 Company Secretary role). Of these seven companies all but one have dissolved, some of them have no financial information at all (no accounts were submitted so either dormant or not keeping in compliance) and the others have negative net worth (basically they had no liquidity).
Either way, a dissolved company is typically a failed company.
The remaining company (the one in question with this thread) which is still active also has no liquidity but that's not a massive concern for two reaons:
1. You can always make deals and payment plans with your creditors until cash flow improves
2. The accounts aren't bang up to date so things could have improved since they were submitted.
I do not set out to tarnish someone but I do like to provide honest and publically accessible data to people on this site so they can make an educated decision of their own.
I have been a Director of quite a few companies in the past and the majority
of these have been very successful while I was a Director.
According to public records this is a completely false statement because as already mentioned above you never resigned your Directorship. Also, some of them did appear to have some success but then they eventually failed.
I never mentioned your name or any other identifiable information on this board and to be honest I don't think anyone here would have been interested anyway, the important thing is the company in question and is it safe to use them.
I don't mind people not liking us but it would be nice not to have this kind of slur.
I have no idea who you are and have never used your company. Therefore there is no logical reason for me to dislike you. There is no slur from me, it's public information I've used and I never said that you were the cause of the failed companies. The only slur is you saying I dislike you, which is again false because I actually said that it would appear to be fine to use you.
If you insist that what I'm saying is false then I'll happily post up information about each company, financials etc which is all perfectly legal as it's publically accessible information. But to be honest I would rather not. I don't think it's necessary and doesn't prove any point.
No harm or offence intended and I've far too much going on in my life at the moment to start some debate or argument about this.