As an almost very happy Sony user, what are these quirks and irritations?
Here's mine..
- Fly by wire lenses, but this is common these days and not specifically a Sony issue.
- Having to dive into the menu to turn the back screen on and off.
- Spot meter limitation, a minor irritation for me.
- and that's about it really.
Some people whinge about battery life but it's ok for me, others whinge about the lack of lenses but they are coming, the placement of the shutter button and controls may be an issue for some but it's fine for me, all pretty much minor things really and nothing that'd push me to sell and buy another brand.
And the + points...
- Compact and lightish package.
- Great image quality.
- It's easy to use manual lenses.
- Some really good AF lenses.
- Great in EVF stuff, histograme, magnified view/peaking etc...
What put me off Fuji...
- FBW lenses!!!!
- Potential raw file processing "issues."
- Repeated rumours about quality woes but this may well be internet panic.
- Question marks over AF performance.
- Base ISO of 200? or maybe the ISO's aren't accurate?
- 1/4000 coupled with question marks over ISO.
- The size of the body and lens package seems to be pushing it a bit for me
(bigger than MFT, might as well go for the A7.)
+ points.
- Good looking cameras.
- Good lenses.
- Good controls.
- APS-C = good compromise and maybe the sweet spot for me for hand held shooting.
MFT...
- FBW lenses!!!!!!
- Initial poor EVF performance in very low light, better with later Panasonic cameras.
- 1/4000 shutter speed, better with the GX7.
- Relatively limited dynamic range and higher ISO performance, a bit better with later cameras.
And the +points.
- Compact package.
- Good handling and controls.
- Good lenses and lots of them, sharp wide open.
- Fast and reliable focus.
TBH DoF doesn't really factor into it all that much for me. Back when I moved from a 20D to a 5D I struggled a bit to readjust to fighting for DoF again after over 7 years with APS-C but I became more confident in maintaining shutter speed by upping the ISO and the image quality still seems to be very good. On the shallow DoF end of things MFT is good enough for me as the lenses are good wide open and if I really want shallow DoF I can perhaps get it by altering the framing.
Looking at these three systems I can see plus points for all and maybe nothing that once in would push me completely out of any of these and into one of the others. Instead of dropping one of these I think it would be better if finances allow to run two, for example Sony for ultimate quality and MFT for compact packaging but it could just as happily be Sony for quality and Fuji for the passion or Fuji for quality and MFT for compact packaging.