- Messages
- 3,654
- Name
- Mark
- Edit My Images
- Yes
D600 is way ahead of 6D. It’s not even close.I don't think the D600 is a particularly good benchmark to compare more recent high-end cameras against? It's contemporary, the Canon 6D, tiddled all over it at the time, both for low light performance and colour rendition, so I'd be very surprised if your Z6 didn't have a significantly better sensor, processor/processing software than the D600 did. Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've heard/read, I believe even dyed in the wool Nikon fans seem to agree the D600 wasn't one of Nikon's finest cameras?
https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-6D-versus-Nikon-D600___836_834
You couldn’t tell a Z6 and a D600 apart at base iso and would struggle at higher ISO’s but tbh they are close enough that it doesn’t matter which one looks worse at intergalactic iso. It’s not that the Z6 is bad just that the D600 was very good and advancements have been incremental.