Currently doing a bit of research into replacements for my 7yr old Dell 8200, which has proved good value so I'm looking for another Dell.
I'm looking to buy something of high enough spec to last me for a long time, and found their Studio XPS and Studio XPS 8000 model lines.
The XPS is offered with a 2.66Ghz 920 i7 processor, X58 chipset, uses tri-channel DDR3 RAM and has 6 DIMM slots, with max. memory 12Gb. Specs
The XPS 8000 is offered with a 2.80Ghz 860 i7 processor, P55 chipset, uses dual-channel DDR3 RAM and has 4 DIMM slots, with max. memory 16Gb.Specs
Pricing is very similar, with both lines starting at about £600.
From reading a couple of tests here and here I get the impression that the hardware in the Studio is aimed more at "enthusiasts" and is older tech, while that in the 8000 is newer, aimed at more mainstream users and offers slightly better performance. It seems to be the classic "old pro" vs. "new consumer" argument.
For a slightly better spec the 8000 is a bit cheaper so looks to be the more attractive option; what am I missing? Am I likely to suffer reduced upgrade potential by going with the more consumer friendly 8000? Is there that much benefit to tri-channel memory? Although the XPS has 6 memory slots, the max capacity is stated at 12Gb - is this likely to be an error (was thinking 6x6Gb is 36Gb) or is this likely to be limited by other aspects of hardware or software?
Also, a max. HD capacity of 1.5Tb is stated for one machine and 1Tb for another; is this likely to be because of max avalable HD capacities at the time of writing or is this likely to be limited by some other factor as well?
Finally, were I to go for the 8000, it appears you can save about £300 on the same spec machine by customising the spec of a lower priced machine to that of the more expensive item.. is this likely to be a cock-up on their part or am I likely to get inferior components (motherboard etc) on the cheaper model? (can provide links if anyone's bargain hunting
)
Cheers, I'll be amazed if anyone is actually able / bothered to reply to this post
I'm looking to buy something of high enough spec to last me for a long time, and found their Studio XPS and Studio XPS 8000 model lines.
The XPS is offered with a 2.66Ghz 920 i7 processor, X58 chipset, uses tri-channel DDR3 RAM and has 6 DIMM slots, with max. memory 12Gb. Specs
The XPS 8000 is offered with a 2.80Ghz 860 i7 processor, P55 chipset, uses dual-channel DDR3 RAM and has 4 DIMM slots, with max. memory 16Gb.Specs
Pricing is very similar, with both lines starting at about £600.
From reading a couple of tests here and here I get the impression that the hardware in the Studio is aimed more at "enthusiasts" and is older tech, while that in the 8000 is newer, aimed at more mainstream users and offers slightly better performance. It seems to be the classic "old pro" vs. "new consumer" argument.
For a slightly better spec the 8000 is a bit cheaper so looks to be the more attractive option; what am I missing? Am I likely to suffer reduced upgrade potential by going with the more consumer friendly 8000? Is there that much benefit to tri-channel memory? Although the XPS has 6 memory slots, the max capacity is stated at 12Gb - is this likely to be an error (was thinking 6x6Gb is 36Gb) or is this likely to be limited by other aspects of hardware or software?
Also, a max. HD capacity of 1.5Tb is stated for one machine and 1Tb for another; is this likely to be because of max avalable HD capacities at the time of writing or is this likely to be limited by some other factor as well?
Finally, were I to go for the 8000, it appears you can save about £300 on the same spec machine by customising the spec of a lower priced machine to that of the more expensive item.. is this likely to be a cock-up on their part or am I likely to get inferior components (motherboard etc) on the cheaper model? (can provide links if anyone's bargain hunting
Cheers, I'll be amazed if anyone is actually able / bothered to reply to this post