1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  1. dibbly dobbler

    dibbly dobbler

    Messages:
    1,350
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes - me too :)
     
  2. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I didn't think we were going to see an upgrade tbh.
     
  3. magicolor1

    magicolor1

    Messages:
    948
    Name:
    Simon
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    The AF speed was the Achilles heel of the mkiii so hopefully this will fix that.
     
  4. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I disagree it's still excellent, not as good as Panasonic's, depends whether you really need these supercharged afs, personally I've not missed a shot because of the af.
    Though I expect the new version to be far superior.
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2017
  5. magicolor1

    magicolor1

    Messages:
    948
    Name:
    Simon
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    AF speed seems to be the key point they're pushing for the mk4 which suggests they felt it was lacking on previous versions. I compared the mk3 against the Panasonic in Jessops recently and thought the Sony was quite a long way behind but that's just my impression from a short use in the shop rather than as an owner.
     
    badlywornroy likes this.
  6. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Agree they're is a difference, the sony sometimes struggles where the panny doesn't and certainly if you do a lot of sports this looks really promising, I had the panny 2500, I picked the Sony for extra reach and better iq otherwise I'd have kept the panny.
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2017
  7. magicolor1

    magicolor1

    Messages:
    948
    Name:
    Simon
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I was looking to upgrade from my existing FZ1000 so looked at the FZ2000 and the Sony mk3. Preferred the Panasonic as the AF seemed faster and more accurate but dpreview thought the iq was worse than the 1000 so held back on the upgrade. Maybe the mk4 Sony is the way to go...
     
  8. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    The mk4 will trump them all I'm sure, but it depends on what you shoot, for the most part the iii is fast and accurate, sometimes I think we get spoiled by new technology and tend to think we need the latest and greatest when what we've got is good enough.
     
  9. architectfadi

    architectfadi

    Messages:
    3,203
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Did anyone see the price tag on the RX10 V4? £1,799 at Park Cameras
     
    Last edited: Sep 13, 2017
  10. mikew

    mikew

    Messages:
    2,242
    Name:
    mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Wow thats cheap :exit:
     
  11. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I'll stick with the iii for now at least
     
  12. magicolor1

    magicolor1

    Messages:
    948
    Name:
    Simon
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Ouch!
     
    Robintaylor likes this.
  13. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Well I'm back on this thread... for now! I indeed ended up with a canon 100D. Cracking camera! However, earlier today I happened past Jessops in Manchester.. popped inside. The managers specials caught my eye.. and within there they had - after a quick google - a Canon G3X. Had a quick search on the web and it revealed to be a decent model - 1" sensor, 24-600 lens.. not too bad!
     
  14. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    So initially; AF is shockingly slow, drive rate is shockingly slow, general operation is rather odd.. twizzle zoom ring around the lens.. but it does not have the option to actually "zoom" the lens...!? And yet the "sub command twizzly dial" (used for aperture setting on my 100D) does have the option... which is very odd! The rear LCD is pretty good - touch option is a nice addition. It has wifi and full HD 60p video.. which seems prettt decent! A few quick ones from this afternoon - quality itself is very good; indeed the squirrel shot was at ISO 4000! A dash or noise reduction/sharopeonf in photoshop (RAW) and all is good. G3X never been a serious contender on this forum I'm guessing?
     
  15. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  16. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Quite a few shiny pennies. Makes the RX10 at around £850-1000 good value!
     
  17. magicolor1

    magicolor1

    Messages:
    948
    Name:
    Simon
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    You don't hear much about the G3X which might be down to the Panasonic and Sony getting better reviews. Your shots look good though, so maybe it deserves more attention.
     
  18. Snapsh0t

    Snapsh0t

    Messages:
    1,672
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    Technically, it doesn't qualify as a bridge camera as it lacks a viewfinder.
     
  19. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I notice the rx10 iv is only touch focus screen, no menu scrolling or anything and still not fully articulated, that will disappoint many I think. It seems a better af system and not much else.
    Apart from a considerable higher price
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2017
  20. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Ahhh... I see! Never realized!
     
  21. mikew

    mikew

    Messages:
    2,242
    Name:
    mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
  22. dibbly dobbler

    dibbly dobbler

    Messages:
    1,350
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    maarten.dhaese and stickytape like this.
  23. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Excellent, I do think people have exaggerated the iii focusing issues.
     
    stickytape and dibbly dobbler like this.
  24. dibbly dobbler

    dibbly dobbler

    Messages:
    1,350
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Well it's never bothered me but I almost always shoot static subjects:)
     
  25. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    I don't shoot any sports but have got bif without any problems as others have shown , of course it's not the best for that but good enough for occasional use , I'm sure the iv will be far superior in that regard but unless that's your main area of photography I see little more it has to offer.
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2017
    dibbly dobbler likes this.
  26. dibbly dobbler

    dibbly dobbler

    Messages:
    1,350
    Name:
    Mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Quite enjoying doing pseudo macro stuff with RX10iii - at 600mm you can focus at around a meter which can give some nice results on bigger insects :)

    [​IMG]
    Red Admiral
    by Mike Smith, on Flickr
     
  27. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Few more from my G3X - recently purchased the viewfinder for it, which helps. Still very impressed with the image quality -even zoomed into 200% these look good; squirrel was at ISO 1000. AF isn’t the quickest, but overall a very good contender! I do miss being able to edit raw images in camera, and you can only wifi across jpeg... but hey wifi is only a gadget, happy to wait til I’m home to transfer to my MacBook!
     

    Attached Files:

    dibbly dobbler likes this.
  28. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It's a pity canon have no intention of updating, if they put their latest af system and incorporated a viewfinder they would certainly have a good option, I had this but the viewfinder and the af was the bug bear for me. But it's still a good camera
     
    stickytape likes this.
  29. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Yes I agree - it’s peculiar they’ve not updated it yet, hopefully they will.. remember the palansomoc FZ50; last one and then nearly 10 years later they updated it! Hopefully not as long this time!
     
  30. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    According to a rep I spoke to earlier in the year they have no plans to update it but I suppose that could change otherwise it remains a sony/Panasonic franchise
     
  31. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    It’s still sold and made though, or are they not even made now?
     
  32. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    They're still available new so I suspect they're still producing them unless it's just stock that's left.
     
  33. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Few more from the G3X...
     
    SsSsSsSsSnake likes this.
  34. SsSsSsSsSnake

    SsSsSsSsSnake

    Messages:
    6,062
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    different :)
     
  35. mikew

    mikew

    Messages:
    2,242
    Name:
    mike
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    A few FZ1000 questions.

    Looking at the online instructions ime struggling to see if this way of working can be set.

    Manual with auto iso and exposure compensation on the zoom lever,after assigning zoom to the manual ring, also does it have a filter thread,some reviews say no but i think Panasonic list 62mm filters for it.

    Thanks
     
  36. SsSsSsSsSnake

    SsSsSsSsSnake

    Messages:
    6,062
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    yes it definitely has a 62mm filter thread
     
    mikew likes this.
  37. stickytape

    stickytape

    Messages:
    395
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    Whoops!
     

    Attached Files:

  38. Robintaylor

    Robintaylor

    Messages:
    661
    Name:
    Robin
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    My rx10 3 is in classifieds if anyone interested
     
  39. Jon Chalk

    Jon Chalk

    Messages:
    219
    Name:
    Jon
    Edit My Images:
    Yes
    mikew likes this.
  40. Snapsh0t

    Snapsh0t

    Messages:
    1,672
    Name:
    Jonathan
    Edit My Images:
    No
    I was wondering who would be first here.

    Because you're getting a IV?
     

Share This Page