Hmmm...made me think

Messages
1,795
Edit My Images
No
I won't name the guy, but we had a presentation recently in my club from a guy who knows his stuff in photography, FRPS, runs workshops and judges and lots of success in exhibitions. The quality of his prints was exceptional, beautifully home printed and the composition in each picture was spot on. Made it so interesting for me as so many shots were of people, 'social documentary', travel orientated in a style sort of National Geographic, Sunday magazines etc.

Part of me felt inspired, part disappointed. The guys enthusiasm for photography and 'get out there and do it NOW' at pensionable age was admirable. Clearly he did. Many of the portraits were taken in rooms under mixed lighting, almost none using fill flash or reflector (where I would have thought it was needed) with the final prints presented perfectly and carefully worked with controlled highlights and detailed shadows. It was the last bit that made me realise that whilst I had some of the shots, I hadn't got the skills to milk the digital image to printed perfection. Not only that, I realised that I didn't have the skills at an advanced level to seamlessly manipulate and move/clone things in the image to get to the perfect final result. In fact part of me was also disappointed that being mostly a street photographer generally averse to much image manipulation was suprised to find comments like 'I had to clone the eyes (or face) from this image to that' so as to get it all about right. Mostly I thought many of these images were 'as taken'. However I actually agreed in the end that I had to move away from settling for almost final result in camera to accepting the making the final image in computer to a greater extent than I previously considered acceptable. I must stress though that this is still a million miles away from the massively photoshopped computer art that seems to be prevelant in the more advanced circles of club photography and exhibitions. His images looked totally natural and professional.

The final point was the equipment. Although he used a full frame Nikon with a good low light ability, his lenses were very modest and lightweight. In fact his main lens was the much maligned Nikon 24-120 f3.5-5.6 VR. Read any test report and this is considered one of the worst Nikon lenses and berated for distortion and being soft. The pictures at A3 were fantastic quality and sharp Door frames and windows straight. We sometimes get on this bandwagon of having 3 tons of equipment, arguements over prime vs zoom, poo pooing consumer class stuff... these images were spot on. I really will give some of my lesser, smaller and lighter equipment a thorough workout and find out what it is capable of.

So, whats the point of this diatribe. I think I just met one of the most influential people so far in my photographic life. I realise that despite winning some competitions and selling pictures, I haven't yet learnt what is capable from both my equipment and the digital image. I need to learn more myself to improve my abilities to cope with the images I am capturing. I also learnt from him and others I have seen that a lifetime of photography even as a hobby can take you all over the world in search of images and interesting things. Of course it's also a good time to think with about 15 years to go I need a shed load of money to enjoy travelling and lots of photography in retirement. Thanks for reading...sorry if it was boring! :lol:
 
Last edited:
Thanks Chris, I didn't see it as intimidation although in a mild sort of way I suppose you could say it is...it was more of a revelation, a realisation and defiantely inspiring. Some of us may never reach such standards which is why there are people that are showing the rest of us the way but at the moment it will make me look at my photography differently and has shown me what is possible from similar digital images even though we all achieve them in differeing ways.
 
this is what i dis-like about digital photography ,change this change that clone manipulate alter make it perfect ,i'll take my rubbish photos anyday rather than manipulated perfection
 
Well in this instance we are talking about some minor tweaks to 'items' within some images but mostly some terrific work to bring out the best in the image from shadows and creating emphasis. To me, that is just getting the best from a picture and seeing his printing perfection changed my opinion.

People have done that for years in the darkroom anyway dodging and burning, choosing the right paper and adjusting exposure to create the look the photographer or printer wanted rather than 'the truth' but this was taking it to another level. So long as we enjoy our hobby what does it matter.

Incidentally great to see you using all that Nikon film stuff. I used it for years, alll those you have plus the FE, FG, F2... loved HP5.
 
Not boring at all, very thought provoking.

Makes you realise what sets the FRPS apart from the rest of us! We all need inspiration.
 
A very interesting observation.

Personally, I think a lot has to do with how you define photography for you. It's always going to be a personal definition, about where you are comfortable drawing the fuzzy line as to how much you are prepared put into the image after the shutter is pressed. Is it just about the image exactly as seen, or the image as seen and felt?
 
Back
Top