- Messages
- 2,233
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- Yes
The topic of Horizons often appears in the Landscape and Scenery section, as it is a key element of most landscape images. However on quite a few occasions even though its considered to be one of the basic skills of taking a landscape image, it is too often missed - my take on it is that you shouldn't be able to ski down the horizon of a seascape, as last time I checked the sea didn't slope
And with the ease of post processing its very easy to straighten out a wonky image. With elements 5 (So quite an out of date bit of software) you're only three clicks away from a perfectly horizontal horizon!
So, whats your take on it? Do you think a horizon on a landscape should be perfectly horizontal? Does it bug you when its not? Is it arty when its purposely way off being horizontal or does that bug you even more?
The reason I want to know is there has been a noticable increase recently in wonky horizons on TalkPhotography and in my general day to day photography encounters... and what really kicked this thread into touch was the fact I was having a look through my flickr contacts and saw a nightscape, quite a nice image, well-lit by the D700's great ISO; interesting sky line, with interesting foreground too. In fact it has been 'explored', had 723 views, 48 comments and 68 'favourites' - I know flickr is just about saying 'ooh yeah great picture' etc, but not one person had commented on the fact the landscapes horizon was miles from being straight! And for that the image was entirely ruined for me.
I know I'm probably opening a huge great big can of worms, but surely a straight horizon is one of the fundamentals of landscape photography?
And with the ease of post processing its very easy to straighten out a wonky image. With elements 5 (So quite an out of date bit of software) you're only three clicks away from a perfectly horizontal horizon! So, whats your take on it? Do you think a horizon on a landscape should be perfectly horizontal? Does it bug you when its not? Is it arty when its purposely way off being horizontal or does that bug you even more?
The reason I want to know is there has been a noticable increase recently in wonky horizons on TalkPhotography and in my general day to day photography encounters... and what really kicked this thread into touch was the fact I was having a look through my flickr contacts and saw a nightscape, quite a nice image, well-lit by the D700's great ISO; interesting sky line, with interesting foreground too. In fact it has been 'explored', had 723 views, 48 comments and 68 'favourites' - I know flickr is just about saying 'ooh yeah great picture' etc, but not one person had commented on the fact the landscapes horizon was miles from being straight! And for that the image was entirely ruined for me.
I know I'm probably opening a huge great big can of worms, but surely a straight horizon is one of the fundamentals of landscape photography?