Firstly, low light and when I am a guest at a wedding I like to take my camera and just one lens.
Secondly, it's excellent for street photography when you are trying to be discreet and silent.
Thirdly, general portraiture lens.
I bought one and it has mysteriously dissapeared and was wondering wether to replace it in the long run?
yes i use it for portraits in low light , and indoor sports
I've got one for the "just in case" scenario. Used it once. Probably move it on. For everyday stuff my 28-70 2.8 does all I need.
Use my nifty on film but for low light situationon my crop sensor i prefer my
30mm F1.4
Roy S
i used mine a lot when i first got it, but i don't use it at all now.
whilst the lens is indeed very sharp from 2.8, the colour/contrast can't match my other primes (100mm f2.8 macro and f135 f2).
50mm is a nice focal length to have in the camera bag and i keep toying with the idea of getting the sigma 50mm f1.4 but i can't make up my mind. HELP ME MAKE UP MY MIND ;-)