Hey now lets not use words like elitism, someone might get the wrong idea.
And you, sir ,like to dish it out, but sulk like a baby when your sarcasm and fascetiousness gets returned with vigour.
Does it really matter if you are a pro or not.
Well ya. The guy wanted to know. Plus professionals get to go on shoots amatuers may not, get access and live a different live. It can matter. Professionals wouldn't be writing and selling books on it if it didn't![]()

In answer to the original question...I am a photographer, it is my full time job and my only source of income.
Yeah the idea was a simple poll of sorts, I genuninely was interested to see the range of people we have on the forum, from those who do this for a living and those that just like taking pics. It seems to be a lot less simple than that though![]()

Yes, it seems rather strange that a simple question can bring up all sorts of issues....![]()
Only full time professionals who earn their sole income from photography tick yes. Others tick no. We get result.
I still think this is a slightly blinkered definition Pete. For insurance purposes, it is majority of income.
It depends how you define photographic income - do the pros that run workshops have to say they are not pros as some of their income comes from tuition, being a tour guide, etc? Is Andy Rouse not a pro as he sometimes has a TV show on Discovery?
Certainly in nature photography, the field I understand best, most of the successful pros have a portfolio career with photography as the mainstay but branching out into other areas such as publishing - if the book is about conservation rather than making photos surely it can't count as photography?
Paul
Out of the 3000 posts a day we get on the forum.....it's funny how most of the bickering is in the business forum......
This was one of the reasons we didn't create one ages ago...we didn't want it to separate the members and become elitist and 'us and them'.
It's still photography related and the opportunity has been granted through their success within photography. Take away the successful photographic track record and they can't dish out the tuition can they?
Out of the 3000 posts a day we get on the forum.....it's funny how most of the bickering is in the business forum......
This was one of the reasons we didn't create one ages ago...we didn't want it to separate the members and become elitist and 'us and them'.
Oh, I agree with you Tomas but I know of people who actually own effectively a hotel to run photographic tours and sell space in the premises to other people when they aren't running courses (does that make them a hotelier?) and write books for general appeal not just to photographers.
I personally still think it would "count" but it is why I am questioning Pete's very narrow definition.
For the record, I am not a professional. I have never sold a print or made any money from photography. I would find it very hard (even if I was good enough) to match the income I get from my day job through photography. I also would struggle with the thought that I had to take pictures to make money and sell. I want to take the images I want to take - for me.
Paul
Does it have to be so damn hard? What do you do? Well I'm a full time dentist. I work as a dentist each day and I get paid to do denistry. Thats my job. If we had a poll for how many people are Nikon photographers would we get dragged into the semantics of it all? I own a Canon G9 so I'm not a full time Nikon photographer really and I'm not a full time Canon photographer despite 99% of my photography being with a Nikon. So we'd have to have a huge 16 page thread discussing the finer points of what a Nikon photographer is. *sigh*. Would this be so hard if we asked how many lawyers we have here? How many web designers? Freelancers? Why is the topic of the professional photographer so damn complicated and heated? Marcel is right. This section is really crazy. Maybe the poll should be "How many amatuers do we have here" as it would cause less trouble.
What do you do? Full time professional photographer? Cool ok tick the box and lets get an idea.
Does it have to be so damn hard? What do you do? Well I'm a full time dentist. I work as a dentist each day and I get paid to do denistry. Thats my job. If we had a poll for how many people are Nikon photographers would we get dragged into the semantics of it all? I own a Canon G9 so I'm not a full time Nikon photographer really and I'm not a full time Canon photographer despite 99% of my photography being with a Nikon. So we'd have to have a huge 16 page thread discussing the finer points of what a Nikon photographer is. *sigh*. Would this be so hard if we asked how many lawyers we have here? How many web designers? Freelancers? Why is the topic of the professional photographer so damn complicated and heated? Marcel is right. This section is really crazy. Maybe the poll should be "How many amatuers do we have here" as it would cause less trouble.
What do you do? Full time professional photographer? Cool ok tick the box and lets get an idea.
Nobody dragged you kicking and screaming into participation in this thread (or maybe they did) simple if you don't like the thread don't participate. :thumbsdown::bang::thumbsdown:
What if I do like the thread, can I participate and try to help the OP get the question answered? That ok?
Not what you have been doing IMO...![]()
Did you actually read his post? Where does it say that he doesn't like this thread? I think he made a very concise point about the original purpose of this thread.
I read the post and agree that it is a good point but have you read the rest of the threads..
Your post quoted a specific one of Pete's but I have read the rest of the thread I still don't see your problem. :shrug:
OK no problem then... '' do we have to do this all over again''