- Messages
- 211
- Name
- Sarah
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I have just come back to this thread as I have a few shows coming up to cover for friends... Now my delightful ex-fiance has taken back my D300 and the Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR lens... B88stard....:bang: both birthday presents but he now claims they are his.... but lets not get into that...
SO anyway... with a limited budget I have bought a D90 (couldn't stretch to a D300
) and also a Nikon 18-135mm f3.5-5.6 G AF-S DX IF-ED Lens
Obviously the gear is not quite as good as my previous set up but for now it's what I can afford... So I am looking at buying a new lens - with a bigger zoom - and was looking at the Nikon 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 G AF-S DX VR or the Nikon Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6 G AF-S DX VR IF-ED ... my question is... will the smaller aperture on the 55-200 make a big difference to the lighting on the pics using a D90... is it worth the extra money to be able to pull more light in, especially as I will often be in indoor arenas which aren't always well lit...
When I win the lottery I will get the same lens I had before, but for now it's just a dream!
SO anyway... with a limited budget I have bought a D90 (couldn't stretch to a D300
Obviously the gear is not quite as good as my previous set up but for now it's what I can afford... So I am looking at buying a new lens - with a bigger zoom - and was looking at the Nikon 18-200mm f3.5-5.6 G AF-S DX VR or the Nikon Nikon 55-200mm f4-5.6 G AF-S DX VR IF-ED ... my question is... will the smaller aperture on the 55-200 make a big difference to the lighting on the pics using a D90... is it worth the extra money to be able to pull more light in, especially as I will often be in indoor arenas which aren't always well lit...
When I win the lottery I will get the same lens I had before, but for now it's just a dream!