How to blatently rip off a photo...

  • Thread starter Thread starter reddeathdrinker
  • Start date Start date
haha the spelling is priceless :D

Seems very odd to just put a picture up in youtube, i never did see the point to that. At least the copyright is readable I guess. Im surprised that somebody who spells like that is able to type "www.youtube.com" into a browser, never mind actually remember a username and password.
 
haha the spelling is priceless :D

Seems very odd to just put a picture up in youtube, i never did see the point to that. At least the copyright is readable I guess. Im surprised that somebody who spells like that is able to type "www.youtube.com" into a browser, never mind actually remember a username and password.

Scortish jimmeh
 
Och yer famous, can I get yer autograph, mister?
 
Jings crivvens help ma boab! Surely the muppet checked the spelling in Windows Movie Maker........ obviously not.
Was it maybe the owner of the car who did this? I suppose in a way it's a back-handed compliment, but the twunt could've had the decency to ask first.
 
How did you find it in the first place?
 
How did you find it in the first place?

I was having a look at some in-car footage from the DCC Stages on YouTube, it came up in the "related" box...

And no, it's not me KayJay - I can spell;)
 
File a report of copyright breach with Youtube and they'll pull it immediately.

Not too worried about the copyright breach - it's only driving visitors to my website:lol:

I'm more concerned about the poor state of education in this country now, with that spelling!!!
 

irony: iron-like; like iron? As in: "this piece of unidentified metal is very irony"?

And it has been pointed out, you have spelled blatantly wrong - bit of an own goal there.:D

Once was pedantic enough, twice would have merely been construed as facetious, unless it was someone pointing out something that had already been pointed out... Taxi for Captain Obvious!
 
There's a comment on there now, asking if he usually steals peoples photos and passes them off as his own:lol:

I'm guessing it was someone on here? :thumbs:
 
Agreed. He's just a kid guys. Agreed it was wrong to use the pic without permission, but cut him a small amount of slack.

Ignorance is no defence.
He is a kid. We should string his parents up then. :p
 
Once was pedantic enough, twice would have merely been construed as facetious, unless it was "someone pointing out something that had already been pointed out... "

Tortology methinks?

The kid shouldn't be cut any slack - he should be educated into the workings of copyright, otherwise he/she and their generation will think it is perfectly acceptable to steal others work, or plagarise it.

Maybe not be too heavy handed, but firm and polite as to the rigts and wrongs. That is where so many parents seem to be failing, they won't chastise their kids for doing wrong when they should be directing down the right path.
 
The loss of his Youtube account and the wasted effort of 66 videos he's posted over a period of seven months should be enough of a lesson.

Shop him in. :D
 
The loss of his Youtube account and the wasted effort of 66 videos he's posted over a period of seven months should be enough of a lesson.

Shop him in. :D

He was just rather rude to me - so I've issued YouTube with a take-down notice. A quick "sorry mate, i'll ask next time" was all it would have taken (and I do let people use the photos IF they ask!).:bat:
 
Well now the original link states: "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by rallyimages.co.uk"
 
Tortology methinks?

others work, or plagarise it.

Maybe not be too heavy handed, but firm and polite as to the rigts and wrongs. That is where so many parents seem to be failing, they won't chastise their kids for doing wrong when they should be directing down the right path.

It is tautology...plagiarise...those are the obvious ones...can we please move on to the split infinitive in the thread title??

:D:lol::thumbs:
 
Back
Top