How would a Nikon 18-70 AFS 3.5/4.5 DX perform in comparison to a 18-200 VR?

[miurasv]

...within the 18 - 70 range of course? Was thinking of maybe getting the 18-200 VR to replace the 18-70 AFS DX if it performs better within that range mainly as it's a very convenient lens. I also have the 70 -300 VR. Thanks in advance.

 

[TG.]

I personally think the 18-70mm has the edge, and i've owned both, but you just have to weigh up convenience against quality

 

[DSLR]

18-70 AFS DX is better i think .Nice set up you have stick with what yoiu have :shrug:

 

[foggy4ever]

with both of the above.

 

[sdb123]

within the 18 - 70 range of course? Was thinking of maybe getting the 18-200 VR to replace the 18-70 AFS DX if it performs better within that range mainly as it's a very convenient lens. I also have the 70 -300 VR. Thanks in advance.

Go with the 18-70mm and 70-300mm lenses.

 

[Klopek]

I also have the 18-70 and 70-300vr combo and am very happy with it. I would stick with this pairing.

 

[Jamieconverge]

ive just got an 18-70 and although ive not used an 18-200 i have to say its a fantastic lens, very pleased with the sharpness. compared to the price of the 18-200 its incredible value. id stick with the 18-70 and 70-300 combo

 

[Wail]

Just think why did Nikon update the 18-200VR so soon after its' release .. that tells a lot about how good / bad it really is!

As for the 18-70 AF-S; now that's one sharp lens .. the 70-300VR is a very good one too.

 

[cambsno]

The 18-70 is a good lens especially with the 70-300VR - which was my setup until today when my 17-55 turned up

That is the only reason why I am selling this lens, sharp, well built and lightweight. Not used a 18-200 and while it sounds ideal for being out and about, have heard it can be soft.