I sold my D700, 24-70, 50mm, SB-900 and used d3000+18-55mm instead

:lol: Didnt see that one coming?!

I hope it was only a brief kit lull?

Tried a 350D the other day - forgot how light they were compared to my 5D with 85 1.2... Not as impressed with the results either :D
 
Being on the look out for my first DSLR I thought this might be a defining thread....my hope dashed in an instant. Still made me laugh though!:D
 
What a surprise...
The D3000 and D5000 are very good in 'optimal' conditions, as the Colonials would say, but when it gets a bit iffy, that's when the more expensive hardware comes into its own...
 
I had to use my friend's Nikon D3000+18-55mm instead for shoots in a restaurant and in a nighclub.

I wasn't impressed with the results I got. :thinking:
:lol:

Mmmmmm says a lot for all those posters who recommend it for a beginners camera...
You could've at least said why you wasn't impressed with it.. Couldn't you at least say why :shrug:

:thinking: As then you may just stop an onslaught of D3000 sales in the classifieds....
 
Actually, I have to disagree with most here; I am always impressed with the abilities of my D40 and, now sold, D60.

Couple either with a small prime lens and I get amazingly good results from them. Of course, I wouldn't substitute any of them for my D700, but there are times when I can't be arsed to carry so much weight.
 
Mmmmmm says a lot for all those posters who recommend it for a beginners camera...
You could've at least said why you wasn't impressed with it.. Couldn't you at least say why :shrug:

:thinking: As then you may just stop an onslaught of D3000 sales in the classifieds....


But it is an excellent beginner's camera - it's just that in certain situations it may struggle - in dark restaurants and clubs AF may be tricky with the kit lens attached (though with a fast lens that wont be so much of a problem)...also the on-camera flash won't produce as pleasing a result as a camera-mounted SB900, which can be 'bounced' around to produce a better quality of light.
 
Mmmmmm says a lot for all those posters who recommend it for a beginners camera...
You could've at least said why you wasn't impressed with it.. Couldn't you at least say why :shrug:

:thinking: As then you may just stop an onslaught of D3000 sales in the classifieds....

My first camera when I started was Nikon D40 and I really loved it.
D3000 is a great camera as well. But when it comes to low-light conditions (in a restaurant) using this camera with a Kit slow lens and without additional external flash is quite difficult. So you are really limited.
But I'm sure the D3000 with a fast prime lens and external flash will be a good combination.
For me it was one more confirmation of "in order to understand how something is really important you have to lose it". :bonk:

what are getting now ?
I’m getting a film camera – just want to try it.
 
But it is an excellent beginner's camera - it's just that in certain situations it may struggle - in dark restaurants and clubs AF may be tricky with the kit lens attached (though with a fast lens that wont be so much of a problem)...also the on-camera flash won't produce as pleasing a result as a camera-mounted SB900, which can be 'bounced' around to produce a better quality of light.

I agree with everything:thumbs:
 
For some learning curve can be expensive one. I try to look at my gear firstly as A successful investment, then as B a pro tool, and then C as a toy. If B helps to get good revenue, then it negates A. C only comes in to play when the cost is relatively low (like reflector or magic mouse)
 
My first camera when I started was Nikon D40 and I really loved it.
D3000 is a great camera as well. But when it comes to low-light conditions (in a restaurant) using this camera with a Kit slow lens and without additional external flash is quite difficult. So you are really limited.
But I'm sure the D3000 with a fast prime lens and external flash will be a good combination.
For me it was one more confirmation of "in order to understand how something is really important you have to lose it". :bonk:

Wasn't being "sarkie" - I just thought that it would've helped if you mentioned why - just for those who were thinking of getting a D3000 thats all - as if they read this thread then it may have put them off..

Thanks for mentioning why now though - :thumbs:

Not that it mattered to me (I own a D300s) but just a little thought to those who do.... I'll :schtum: now... :coat: :exit:
 
It all depends what you are used to. Now I am used to my D300 i would struggle to go back to my old D40. At the time, I had come from a 4 year old Sony compact, and was blown away by the D40. I am now blown away by the D300 and would probably wonder what was so good about it if I had a D3!
 
will you scan them ?
I think it's the best thing to do - film, good scan, PP , print . if you're in no rush and don't have a client calling you every day.
 
What film body are you using? The F6 is a dream come true. You would be at home using it having owned a D700 which I personally refer to as a digital F6.

Depending on the application at hand I use both film and digital. Each has its advantages and disadvantages of course.
 
What film body are you using? The F6 is a dream come true. You would be at home using it having owned a D700 which I personally refer to as a digital F6.

Depending on the application at hand I use both film and digital. Each has its advantages and disadvantages of course.

I'm going to use either Rolleiflex Planar 3,5F or Rollei 6008AF depending on the results of my scans.
 
Hmm, my experience was similar but the results were different.

Last September I sold my Nikon D700, Nikon 24-70 2.8, Nikon 70-200mm 2.8 VR, Nikon 105mm 2.8 VR Micro, Nikon 50mm 1.8.

I bought a Canon 500D, 3 primes and a 270ex flash. I shot a whole wedding reception in low light club and video'd the first dance too. I absolutely loved it haha.
 
Back
Top