Is the new Sony RX10 a very expensive, but excellent solution for almost all travel and casual photography?
Imaging Resource and other reviewers think it's an acceptable interchangeable lens DSLR replacement.
A 20Mp back lit Sony sensor, as used in the much praised RX100 II, a very special Zeiss 24-200mm f2.8 lens with almost macro capabilities for stills and videos.
Only problem seems to be PRICE, which is HUGE and weight, which is also huge.
Cheapest portable f2.8 zooms are the Lumix 12-35 & 35-100s - just the 35-100 costs as much as the Sony.
Think it's a perfect solution to 99.99% of my needs, so I'm getting mine on Monday!
Will report back with my findings soon.
Wonder what any one else thinks - wish it had a 7-14mm Lumix equivalent add-on to complete my happiness?
Imaging Resource and other reviewers think it's an acceptable interchangeable lens DSLR replacement.
A 20Mp back lit Sony sensor, as used in the much praised RX100 II, a very special Zeiss 24-200mm f2.8 lens with almost macro capabilities for stills and videos.
Only problem seems to be PRICE, which is HUGE and weight, which is also huge.
Cheapest portable f2.8 zooms are the Lumix 12-35 & 35-100s - just the 35-100 costs as much as the Sony.
Think it's a perfect solution to 99.99% of my needs, so I'm getting mine on Monday!
Will report back with my findings soon.
Wonder what any one else thinks - wish it had a 7-14mm Lumix equivalent add-on to complete my happiness?