Sorry everyone as I'm sure this must have been asked loads of times before, but after a quick search I was unable to find anything. I can only presume I was searching the wrong thing.
My question is basically about the confusion with image sizes that I encountered as explained below.
I had a load of images that I needed to resize etc. Some of them were slightly cropped but windows explorer said they were all about 8mb jpeg files. I opened them all in Photoshop CS3 for resizing and when I got to this point, it was suggesting the image files were around 21mb. After resizing (to 1500 px long side) it was claiming the file sizes were around 5mb each.
Then when burning the 26 images to a disc windows explorer is suggesting the total folder size is 12mb and that each image is a couple of hundred kb.
Why is this? Which is correct?
Can somebody clear this up for me as its got me VERY confused!
Also the images remained jpegs throughout the whole process and were jpegs from a D300. Some had also been cropped using Lightroom before the CS3 resizing.
Thanks in advance!
Alex
My question is basically about the confusion with image sizes that I encountered as explained below.
I had a load of images that I needed to resize etc. Some of them were slightly cropped but windows explorer said they were all about 8mb jpeg files. I opened them all in Photoshop CS3 for resizing and when I got to this point, it was suggesting the image files were around 21mb. After resizing (to 1500 px long side) it was claiming the file sizes were around 5mb each.
Then when burning the 26 images to a disc windows explorer is suggesting the total folder size is 12mb and that each image is a couple of hundred kb.
Why is this? Which is correct?
Can somebody clear this up for me as its got me VERY confused!

Also the images remained jpegs throughout the whole process and were jpegs from a D300. Some had also been cropped using Lightroom before the CS3 resizing.
Thanks in advance!
Alex