Infra Red

Galaxy66

Galaxy66

Jeremy Beadle
Messages
9,190
Name
My name is Mal not Jeremy :)
Edit My Images
Yes
Like marmite love it or hate it. Taken with my fully converted infra red 450D.:)
1
5568809303_6b0d24400c_b.jpg


2 One without the colour channels switched.
5535124248_216821b2ea_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
no finding the first one not that great. but loving the second one.
 
Last edited:
Cliffsh said:
liking the second mate, different :)
Click to expand...

Cheers Cliff, it certainly is different!

thething84 said:
no finding the first one that great. but loving the second one.
Click to expand...
Thanks James, the second one is as it comes out the camera as a Jpeg I shoot one of each Raw + Jpeg. see if you like the colour channel switch on the bridge.

oskanoears said:
I prefer number one number 2 would suit a black and White convert
Click to expand...

Thanks Andy, they do lend themselves to mono conversions well, i actually have one of the bridge I will post.
 
Colour channel switch of the bridge.
3.
5569759716_c801dcbc79_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
And for those that like it as it comes out the camera, another view of the bridge.
4.
5524373060_837908b0ff_b.jpg
 
And a quick mono conversion.
5.
5569221149_8f36c25c93_b.jpg
 
Like all these very surreal.
How much was it to have the camera converted and do you still have to use a filter?




Gaz
 
Number 2 is spot on - sometime schannel swap works, sometimes it's better off the camera and sometimes it's better in Mono, this one is perfect as it is. (y)
 
I love number 2 also, great shot. I've been playing with Ir lately also, and it's nice to see the shots before and after the channel swap. :)

Did you tweak the curves also?
 
quiteone said:
Like all these very surreal.
How much was it to have the camera converted and do you still have to use a filter.
Gaz
Click to expand...

Hi Gaz, for Canon XXD and XXXD bodies it costs £300 for the conversion, I bought a mint 450D with only a few hundred clicks for only £80 more:)
Once the conversion is done you use it like a normal camera.


Alan Clogwyn said:
Number 2 is spot on - sometime schannel swap works, sometimes it's better off the camera and sometimes it's better in Mono, this one is perfect as it is. (y)
Click to expand...

Thanks Alan, I have also found how well it turns out depends on where the sun is in relation to the subject more so than in normal photography, directly behind the camera gives best results.

HuntMike said:
I love number 2 also, great shot. I've been playing with Ir lately also, and it's nice to see the shots before and after the channel swap. :)

Did you tweak the curves also?
Click to expand...
Cheers, no.2 seems to be coming
out tops:) no curves adjustment just levels set to auto on CS5

c4rv3r said:
I love number 2! Such unusual colours.
Click to expand...

Cheers Steve.
 
And finally a normal version of the bridge, taken with a different body of course.
6.
5532686857_d0d3809852_b.jpg
 
Dedicated IR cameras are the way to go, I had my Nikon D70 done about 5 years ago, and it still produces great IR images. I also prefer your second shot as I find having something manmade in IR shots works so much better.
 
Nikon Fan said:
Dedicated IR cameras are the way to go, I had my Nikon D70 done about 5 years ago, and it still produces great IR images. I also prefer your second shot as I find having something manmade in IR shots works so much better.
Click to expand...

My plan is to use it for abstract shots, but I have since found that something man made in the shot does work well as you say.
 
Very nice work, Mal. I was going to offer to send you the DNG profile I'd created from your images you sent me. I don't think I'll bother now, as you clearly don't need it! :)
 
happy haggis said:
Very nice work, Mal. I was going to offer to send you the DNG profile I'd created from your images you sent me. I don't think I'll bother now, as you clearly don't need it! :)
Click to expand...

Cheers Trevor, looking forward to seeing what you have made of them:)

5000th post just for you:D
 
Galaxy66 said:
Hi Gaz, for Canon XXD and XXXD bodies it costs £300 for the conversion, I bought a mint 450D with only a few hundred clicks for only £80 more:)
Once the conversion is done you use it like a normal camera
Click to expand...

Thanks(y)
I'll have a look into having one of my bodys converted.




Gaz
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top