Ir filters any experienve & which 1?

Messages
277
Name
Shane dennigan
Edit My Images
No
Hi,

I'm thinking of doing IR photography as I have seen some amazing images but I'm new to this photography and have one or two basic questions,

Do they work for digital in my case Nikon d700 and I see so many cheap types on eBay any advise on what to get and what not.

Thank you
 
If it's just to have a go at IR I'd suggest just buying an cheap filter off Ebay first to see if it's something you'll be taking further, before splashing out on an expensive one. Also remember, if you're going to use a filter on the lens you'll need a tripod as with something like your D700 you'll be looking at an exposure time of anywhere from 15 seconds upwards.
 
Don't expect to just buy a filter and be off on a nice happy IR cruise, you need to hav mastered a few fundamentals before getting anything useable from IR (Not to put you off but expect work to get anything good!):

Firstly camera and lens. Not all are capable of working with IR filters, especially true of Canon and Nikon, even more so if you use third party modern lenses. (search for info about hot spots in infra red photograpy, there's a very long list of no go lenses somewhere).

Seond, filter. Several filters available - the most common is the Hoya R72 or it's clones. Standard duotone Infra red filter, good for colour and B&W. It's around 720nm. 890nm etc are B&W only 650nm is false colour, I like it for portraits but that's it.

Third - the quirks of handling. IR focusses at different distances to normal light, AF will be fine as long as you trust it because you won't be able to see through the viewfinder at all. Manual focus lenses are a no go unless they have IR index mark, you can focus accurately from the scale and are prepared for some dud shots. (Focus then fit filter). Live view should just about let you see through the filter at big apertures.

Fourth - Processing. White Balance is very tricky to set for false colour, not so important for B&W (though it does subtly alter the image). Best Shoot Raw anyway as there will be a lot of work to do. Mst usual PP is to flip the colour channels - you swap the red with the blue normally.

That's a very quick rundown. I used to love shooting IR with my old Olympus because it woudl focus in IR just like it would with daylight and the white balance was easily set to just how I like it. However with my Panasonic I cannot get it anywhere near where I want. Sometimes it results in a good image but it's not ideal.

I use a Neewer 720nm filter and a no name 650nm filter, but only rarely for the latter as I don't much like it's results.
 
From experience.. check the lens compatibility as well as the camera (Google is your friend).. some lenses are better for IR than others due to the way they are designed (e.g. the Sigma 30mm is prone to hotspotting).
 
Might be worth checking to see how good the D700 is for IR anyway. I know my D80 wasn't brilliant. Older Nikons were pretty good for IR but newer ones had too good a filter over the sensor.
My GF1 on the otherhand is brilliant for IR. I use a 720nm IR filter. Setting WB is easy, filter on, point at brightly lit grass and use that for the custom setting.
Post processing wise, I use a custom action for Photoshop to swap the red & blue channels then play with the image after that.
 
Did you try Googling?

If not.. this relevant discussion was the top result. You'll need to read most of the responses on that thread to get a full overview.
 
Back
Top