- Messages
- 1,596
- Name
- Paul
- Edit My Images
- Yes
as above really , i am pondering this as i can i reckon do it for virtually nothing financially , just wondering if it is going to worth it photographically 
If you can do it for not much but depending on how you're getting it for virtually nothing it would be even better to go for a 40d.![]()
The main differences are outlined here,
If its not going to cost you anything then I don't see why not to![]()
I was choosing between the 2 for my first SLR camera ,
when I went into jessops he said the only real difference is the mp? So i went for the 1000D as it was cheaper... is he wrong? should I take it back and go for the 450D instead?