On the same topic and same lens- I have had a very quick play with it and can hear the IS working- but not amazed at the sharp images it produced- shutter speeds were down to approx 1/4 sec hand held of course but the only pics I could take were inside and not the brightest light. Also what is it that makes indoor images come out too "warm"- almost like lit by fire light?
I guess I'll have to play during the day with natural light and compare IS and non IS pics- its a pity I sold my 75-300 the other day as it would have been interesting to have taken some like for like pics!!
It's the colour of the light, the 'colour temperature' and is controlled by the camera's White Balance settings.
Tungsten light (eg bulbs) is yellow/orange. Flourescent light tends to be a bit green. Your eye (or rather your brain) automatically corrects it so things 'look' right.
You have to do that manually with a camera, which is what the White Balance settings are about. See the manual.
BTW, while IS is very effective, it can't work miracles. Rule of thumb for a normal non-IS lens is that you should not hand-hold it with a shutter speed that is longer than the 'effective' focal length, that is actual focal length multiplied by the crop factor.
So if your lens is set to 200mm, plus the 1.6x crop factor, the effective focal length is 320mm, so you should avoid using a shutter speed longer than 1/320sec. Since you have IS, you should be able to beat that by up to three stops which would take you down to 1/40sec (320>160>80>40 = 3 stops). That's a very rough guide and some people can beat that, but often not reliably.
Also bear in mind that IS only reduces camera shake - it can do nothing for subject movement which will still blurr at longer shutter speeds, even when the camera is perfectly steady.