Just ordered a Canon 7D 18-135 Kit what next?

EOS_JD said:
0% finance is a myth.... They are just including the finance costs in your purchase price!

Not really, as if you bought it outright there and then, you'd still be paying for finance you havnt used by that rationale!
 
Not sure I understand? if you had bought there and then, you'd have paid more than you could have bougtht elswewhere. You also have the option to buy cheaper and take a 12 month loan for probably around the same price is what I meant.
 
Oh I thought we were referring to the off the shelf Jessops price and the finance (as it sounds the price is still the same as the off the shelf price even with finance).

But I agree, unless you need the 0% finance you're always better off going somewhere else, especially on line.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the replies,
Ultimately I want to be able to take pictures of motorcycles at the track. I know I need a much better lens for that. I'm not sure which yet but it will be an L Series, may be the 70-200 the 70-300 or the 100-400. I'm looking at spending £1000-1500 for the lens. The racing starts in March so I have some time to get used to the camera, save up & work out which one.

Back on topic; for my 2 pence worth...take a look at the Sigma 120~300mm 2.8 OS. If you search around you could pick one up for around your budget(digital rev). aparently its a cracking lens for the money and goes fairly well well tele's. However I can't speak form experience as I borrowed a ridiculous amount of money and purchased the 300mm 2.8 canon. (still yet to get out, waiting for a tripod collar:thumbsdown:) I do have the 100~400mm and its a great lens but don't expect amazing results at the 400 end wide open; it's fairly soft. :)
 
Last edited:
Back on topic; for my 2 pence worth...take a look at the Sigma 120~300mm 2.8 OS. If you search around you could pick one up for around your budget(digital rev). aparently its a cracking lens for the money and goes fairly well well tele's. However I can't speak form experience as I borrowed a ridiculous amount of money and purchased the 300mm 2.8 canon. (still yet to get out, waiting for a tripod collar:thumbsdown:) I do have the 100~400mm and its a great lens but don't expect amazing results at the 400 end wide open; it's fairly soft. :)

Thanks,

I think I'm decided on the 70-200 f2.8 mk II lens though. I know it might be a little short at most tracks but seems on balance it seems to be a good all rounder & I can get an extender later if needed.
 
So after much deliberation I've took the plunge and ordered a 7D with the 18-135 Kit Lens. I've already purchased a 32GB CF Card what else do I need?

Would you put a UV filter on this lens? do you get different quality UV filters?

Please help the noob :)

IMO don't use the UV just use the 18-135mm hood the 18-135mm is a nice walkabout lens, the problem with other people telling you to sell it is that they never used the this lens, i use this lens 90% of the time on my camera.
 
Last edited:
IMO don't use the UV just use the 18-135mm hood the 18-135mm is a nice walkabout lens, the problem with other people telling you to sell it is that they never used the this lens, i use this lens 90% of the time on my camera.

Thanks, I'm happy with the lens so far. The only alternative for me would have been the 15-85 kit lens which is supposed to be much better but most of the pictures I have take so far have been further than 85mm so I think I made the right choice so far.
 
Doca said:
So after much deliberation I've took the plunge and ordered a 7D with the 18-135 Kit Lens. I've already purchased a 32GB CF Card what else do I need?

Would you put a UV filter on this lens? do you get different quality UV filters?

Please help the noob :)

Junk the 18-135 and buy a decent lens lol
 
I've just ordered the Canon 70-200 IS USM mk II. :eek:

Now that IS a lens :) I actually find it too heavy BUT the results are fantastic so will be keeping mine
 
POAH said:
Junk the 18-135 and buy a decent lens lol

It is a decent lens.
 
have you ever used one?

I think with all gear you can always argue 'this' is better than 'that' if you compare apples and oranges, however cost vs performance vs flexibility its a good lens. unless you want to buy a range of very expensive lenses then swap from one to the other all the time, in one reasonable package you can take the 18-135 with you cover a wide range of uses and get good results. for someone starting out or looking for lightweight convenience and flexibility its worthwhile. it all depends on what you want from the lens....

e.g. here a pic I took with that lens on the same camera... zero editing, as off the camera.. is there anything substandard about the image quality?

6631348297_b5c344ba1f_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
POAH said:
Compared to what on a 7D. Only canon lens it appears to be better than is the 18-200. I've never read a good review of it.

Ive used it, it's a superb lens, and I've used a lot (hell of a lot!) of lenses. The one I tested I found was so good I bought that very lens.

From what you've posted it's clear you've never used one?

If you don't believe me, I too can post up some images?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top