Thanks fellers. It's unblievable the size of some of the fish these birds can swallow! This was one of the smaller ones.
My only regret was not taking the 300mm 2.8 for a go at some dive shots-the 500mm was just too long to have any serious chance, these are all full frame.
Also showing nicely to newcomers Ced`s, the very shallow depth of field, bird toggers have to contend with.
No probs Will - I don't mind criticism anyway. I ws shooting wide open at f/4. so the only way I could have increased the shutter speed was to increase the ISO, with the attendant risk of more noise qhich I really didn't want to do, my priority was some really sharp static shots, so these were a bonus.they are a wonderful set,but I have a question to ask and this is not meant as a criticism,could the shutter speed have been faster to give the water droplets more definition, because as it stands they look like blemishes on the image.
Right, I have been motivated, i`m off up the beck............
No probs Will - I don't mind criticism anyway. I ws shooting wide open at f/4. so the only way I could have increased the shutter speed was to increase the ISO, with the attendant risk of more noise qhich I really didn't want to do, my priority was some really sharp static shots, so these were a bonus.
It's a difficuly call really, you want a sense of movement in the shots and some of the bird shots could have probably done with a little blur in parts of the bird. I keep coming back to wishing I'd taken the 300 2.8 though, which would have given me a stop faster shutter speed, especially for the dive shots.