There is sharpness and focus adjustment in manufacture, basically putting the lens together correctly (which can be put right by the manufacturers) and then there is focus calibration to the camera body, which is something different.
Problems with the former will mean the lens is never properly sharp. With the latter, it's sharp, but the plane of sharp focus is not where it should be which is what you can adjust with micro AF.
Live view focus, using the contrast-detect system off the LCD, works independently of normal AF and should always be spot on. Easy way to compare.
A great article of 'soft' lenses here.

A great article of 'soft' lenses here.
The thing is, the argument about lens tolerance +camera tolerance adding up to unsharp lenses doesn't stack up when other manufacturers don't seem to have the same common occurrence of complaints.:shrug:
The thing is, the argument about lens tolerance +camera tolerance adding up to unsharp lenses doesn't stack up when other manufacturers don't seem to have the same common occurrence of complaints.:shrug:
On the other hand, Sigma are the biggest selling independent brand and I think they sell more lenses across all fitings than either Nikon or Canon do on an individual basis, so the law of averages is against them.
I suppose that's true
Good luck focus checking a 10-20mm lens. There's so much DoF on those it's very difficult to check at sensible distances. Equally, it's hard to believe that it's going to be far out off optimum focus in real shooting for the same reason.