- Messages
- 8,956
- Name
- Bazza
- Edit My Images
- No
When I went to the USA last year the main lens I used was the Nikon 24-120 f3.5-f5.6 VR which produced good results. Now owning the Nikon 24-70 f2.8 I can't make up my mind which would be better to take as I may well be off to Brazil later on to see my grand daughter.
The 24-120 has VR but needs more light and the 24-70 needs less light is "faster for moving subjects" but no VR
What I intend to use for is family shots and general views
Then again I have the Nikon 50mm f1.4G lens and the Tamron 90mm F2.8 which are both lighter. Suppose this is one of the problems of owning a few lenses.
Don't think taking my 70-300 lens is worth it as I really want to limit to just 2 lenses.
Help
Realspeed
The 24-120 has VR but needs more light and the 24-70 needs less light is "faster for moving subjects" but no VR
What I intend to use for is family shots and general views
Then again I have the Nikon 50mm f1.4G lens and the Tamron 90mm F2.8 which are both lighter. Suppose this is one of the problems of owning a few lenses.
Don't think taking my 70-300 lens is worth it as I really want to limit to just 2 lenses.
Help
Realspeed