- Messages
- 1,589
- Edit My Images
- Yes
So I recently bought a sigma fixed 2.8 lens, knowing full well image quality is lens to lens and some are great and some are pants
Well here is a couple of shots taken on the new lens
The snake was done handheld at night, and the only light in the room was the snake's bulb... so max of about 1500 - 2000 Lumens
The dogs were done on a cloudy day , at the beach, again handheld.
The gecko was done with onboard flash
I am not exactly happy with how they came out
But is it a lens issue or a mistake i've made ?
(I'd be much happier if it's something I've done wrong, and not the lens being a poor copy)
So these were done on a Canon 50d, with the Sigma Fixed 2.8 17-50 lens (non vc)
Well here is a couple of shots taken on the new lens
The snake was done handheld at night, and the only light in the room was the snake's bulb... so max of about 1500 - 2000 Lumens
The dogs were done on a cloudy day , at the beach, again handheld.
The gecko was done with onboard flash
I am not exactly happy with how they came out
But is it a lens issue or a mistake i've made ?
(I'd be much happier if it's something I've done wrong, and not the lens being a poor copy)
So these were done on a Canon 50d, with the Sigma Fixed 2.8 17-50 lens (non vc)