Beginner Lens

[Roy1212]

ordered for tomorrow. L lens 16-35 f4 are their any negatives?

 

[Grumps1974]

IMHO one of Canon's best. I have no criticisms at all of this lens.

Enjoy.

 

[Roy1212]

Thank you,the guy in Jessops believed it was better than the 2.8?

 

[Willid1]

You won't regret buying this especially if you are using a full frame camera.

David

 

[Grumps1974]

Thank you,the guy in Jessops believed it was better than the 2.8?

General consensus seems to be that it is better than the 2.8 in all respects other than the extra stop of the 2.8.

 

[Roy1212]

Just picked it up.looking forward to using it tomorrow,I have a 10-20 for sale now.lol

 

[Grumps1974]

Just picked it up.looking forward to using it tomorrow,I have a 10-20 for sale now.lol

How much?

 

[Roy1212]

Got it for £650 and a free Hoya polarised lens,please don't tell me I could of got it cheaper elsewhere.lol

 

[Grumps1974]

No how much for the 10-20?

 

[Pads1980]

No how much for the 10-20?

I was going to ask the same question

 

[Roy1212]

I'll have a look at it tomorrow there's no marks on it and it's no more than 1 year old,lens both caps may have the box.

 

[odd jim]

Thank you,the guy in Jessops believed it was better than the 2.8?

At f/2.8, the f/2.8 is much better.

 

[Roy1212]

Lol

 

[MatBin]

You will only get negatives if you put in on a film camera and then only if you use the right film.
Matt

 

[TareqPhoto]

The only negatives i can think about this lens are:

1. Can't go wider than 16mm
2. Can't go longer than 35mm
3. Don't do f2.8
4. Doesn't have IS








Wait, it has IS, then only 3 negatives

 

[B1ts]

At f/2.8, the f/2.8 is much better.

Yeah but at f4 and above the IS is much better.....

 

[TareqPhoto]

Yeah but at f4 and above the IS is much better.....

And Tamron has 2.8 and VC[equivalent to IS]