Hello,
I have the 35mm for low light and the 18-200 for nature and outdoors in general
Question 1
Am i right to say that with the 35mm, i am OK. Is it worth buying 50mm or another FX option. If yes which one. I would need it mainly for close range in the evening, night... maybe a portrait
Question 2
What affordable FX option do I have for the 18-200 / or a DX option. I just have the impression I have not sharpness enough. I like to shoot mainly mountains, landscape, beaches and the sea
My thoughts:
There is this famous 135 mm with defocus - it is sharp and for both portraits and landscape... but it is expensive
What if my budget is limited to £300-400
I have the 35mm for low light and the 18-200 for nature and outdoors in general
Question 1
Am i right to say that with the 35mm, i am OK. Is it worth buying 50mm or another FX option. If yes which one. I would need it mainly for close range in the evening, night... maybe a portrait
Question 2
What affordable FX option do I have for the 18-200 / or a DX option. I just have the impression I have not sharpness enough. I like to shoot mainly mountains, landscape, beaches and the sea
My thoughts:
There is this famous 135 mm with defocus - it is sharp and for both portraits and landscape... but it is expensive
What if my budget is limited to £300-400