I've been searching on the forum and watched a number of youtube vidoes and whilst I appreciate the differences between zoom and prime, 300 vs 400 etc etc am hoping someone here has actually used both.
I'm seriously thinking about trading in all my DSLR gear and putting towards / or getting the 300mm f4 Pro and either a 2x or 1,4x teleconverter. I had considered the 100-400 oly put it doesn't seem to have sync IS.
I do progressively more wildlife photography, birds, deer and now wild goats with the OM-1
Had the PL out the other day and got some photos of the goats on hillside but could have done with more reach; physically getting closer wasn't option.
So, any used both lens and preferred one over the other? How does the 300mm F4 with 2x compare in image quality to the PL?
PS if you reply, I'll likely start trawling through your flickr photos too
I'm seriously thinking about trading in all my DSLR gear and putting towards / or getting the 300mm f4 Pro and either a 2x or 1,4x teleconverter. I had considered the 100-400 oly put it doesn't seem to have sync IS.
I do progressively more wildlife photography, birds, deer and now wild goats with the OM-1
Had the PL out the other day and got some photos of the goats on hillside but could have done with more reach; physically getting closer wasn't option.
So, any used both lens and preferred one over the other? How does the 300mm F4 with 2x compare in image quality to the PL?
PS if you reply, I'll likely start trawling through your flickr photos too