Lucky SHD50 35mm film

Cluster

Cluster

Messages
794
Name
Dave
Edit My Images
Yes
Has anyone tried Lucky SHD50 B&W film?
The 30.5m bulk roll is discounted to around £33 on Aliexpress at the moment. I have ordered a roll to play with.
 
Last edited:
Nope. I do have a roll of SDH100 on the shelf though. Bought some random B & W a few months ago to try out.
 
Reviews online for the SHD50 (in particular) are less than glowing..... much less!
Ah well...... something to experiment with.
 
Last edited:
Cluster said:
The 100ft roll arrived. I put it into a Watson bulk loader and rolled around a dozen frames into a cassette.
It is a very fetching shade of blue/green. I'll expose it soon at 6/12/25/50 to get some idea of its speed.
Click to expand...
Looking forward to seeing that Dave.
 
Oh..... the massive dev chart shows SHD50 with Rodinal for only two speeds, 25 and 6. Perhaps a speed of 50 is unrealistic (as commented by several users).
Not sure if a 12 to 25 speed film is much use to me! Might be good for a tripod session.
 
Cluster said:
Oh..... the massive dev chart shows SHD50 with Rodinal for only two speeds, 25 and 6. Perhaps a speed of 50 is unrealistic (as commented by several users).
Not sure if a 12 to 25 speed film is much use to me! Might be good for a tripod session.
Click to expand...

Whats the times for six and 25 ?

you could try adding half the difference in the gap between 6 and 25 or maybe increase by 75% of half the difference
 
In a brief burst of almost sunshine, I photographed my garden fence at 12, plus 2, 1, minus 2, 1.
Because I also have a short length of film from my Agfa ISORapid I, I have combined them on one reel and will give them a go in the Bellini Duo Step (Diafine clone).
This usually does a good job. I'll try it at 5 mins.
 
So, a quick dev session in Bellini Duo Step for 5mins (each part). The time was just a stab in the dark, a starting point.
Camera Minolta Dynax 5 with 50mm f1.7 at 5.6. Matrix metering. Medium contrast scene, hazy sunlight, definite shadows.

In the image, two sets of frames from the left, ISO 3, 6, 12, 25 and 50.
I will scan them later. It looks as if the 12 is usable, possibly the 25 will be a little thin. The 50 is not a runner at all.
Just from these negs, something between 12 and 25 may be nice. But this will be for specialised work, probably on a tripod.

There were no marks on the cleared negative, which came out clear in unexposed areas.


SHD50Lightbox.jpg
 
Last edited:
After scanning (photographed with Samsung camera as a JPG then small adjustments made to curve).

I found the slightly thinner neg at 25 easier to work with. The 12 version had too high contrast, but this could be partly due to the development it had (suffered).


SAM_5715mS.jpg

Crop of ISO25 image.



AtISO25.jpg

I can't clearly see any grain.
 
Last edited:
A crop at pixel per pixel scale from a 3500x2300 pixel image, unprocessed other than a small change in the curve (black).
Of course, as a jpg image from my camera, the camera has done some level of processing to this image and I recognise the level of sharpness
as being typical for regular digital shots from this camera.

100pcCrop.jpg
 
Last edited:
At the pixel level in the image above, I would expect to see grain in the film that I normally use.
Given that the slight softness of the image (at the 100% pixel level) is something that is perfectly expected from this camera.... and that I can't see grain, might this suggest that the image on the negative might be more detailed than my present scanning process is capable of showing?
 
Cluster said:
Oh..... the massive dev chart shows SHD50 with Rodinal for only two speeds, 25 and 6. Perhaps a speed of 50 is unrealistic (as commented by several users).
Not sure if a 12 to 25 speed film is much use to me! Might be good for a tripod session.
Click to expand...
Yes, I think the speed of 50 is unrealistic. I've a 100ft roll which I'm planning on shooting at 25 - when I finally get the film out the fridge and into the bulk loader!
 
Given the results from my first test roll, I think this might be a usable film for some applications and probably even hand hold on bright days.
The detail possible might be beyond the capability of most of my equipment. (I've ordered another roll).
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top