macro lens

Have you thought about something like the Raynox 250?

It attaches to the front of your existing lenses and will give you a chance to see if macro is really for you. It costs less than £40 and will give you a chance to practice your technique for shooting macro. There is a whole thread of macro pictures with the Raynox somewhere in the macro section.

I've noticed you're talking about the manual focussing aspect of the lenses, but at 1:1 you don't actually focus, but move the camera back and forward to get the subject in focus. This is actually a movement of mm and therein lies the macro technique which makes it so hard to get the images you see on this forum.

HTH


thanks for this post i will have a look when i wake up later, does this just attach to the kit lens?
 
right. so it would attach to a tamron 70-300mm and a nikon 18-55 mm kit lens?

That's the exact lenses that I had mine attached to mate. :thumbs:

If I have some time later i'll try and hunt out some pictures from my portable HD.
 
Just a couple of quick pics i've just taken of a dead fly on a needle.

Afraid I can't get to my HD.

No.1 Tamron 70-300mm with Raynox set at 70mm
4857395508_d8b7da3079_b.jpg



No.2 Tamron 90mm Macro lens with Raynox
4856773623_234827c6d9_b.jpg


No.3 Tamron 70-300mm with Raynox set at 300mm.
4856773909_f2fd996bf8_b.jpg
 
sigma 180mm APO macro HSM ............... great lens

4732869944_a272bb982f_o.jpg



3867414495_a5f35534ae_o.jpg
 
Last edited:
Just to add, the fly was about 5mm in size and the higher the focal length the greater your working distance. All pictures straight from camera.

The 70mm gave me a working distance of only a few cm's, the 90mm gave me a working distance of 10cm and at 300mm I had a working distance of about 17cm although if you're not using a tripod it's damn near impossible to get a decent sharp image.

With the Raynox it gives a greater magnification depending on focal length as you might have guessed.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top