- Messages
- 2,509
- Name
- Paul
- Edit My Images
- No
Having fallen flat on my face with a 105mm F/2 DC, I'm tempted by the cheaper and apparently sharper 105mm macro. I tried it for a few shots in the shop yesterday and it seemed good all round - sharp, focused okay, lots of contrast.
My main use would be for portraits on my D300s. I tried it against the 85mm f1.4 D and I preferred the length and IQ of the 105 - but obviously the 85 has the benefits of the larger aperture on its side. Mind you at f1.4, the 85 wasn't exactly sharp. The 85mm f1.4G would be great but I can't afford it. The other alternative would be the Sigma 85mm.
The reviews say they are both good but I trust you lot more. Anybody use either or both of these babies? Any good? On a cropper?
My main use would be for portraits on my D300s. I tried it against the 85mm f1.4 D and I preferred the length and IQ of the 105 - but obviously the 85 has the benefits of the larger aperture on its side. Mind you at f1.4, the 85 wasn't exactly sharp. The 85mm f1.4G would be great but I can't afford it. The other alternative would be the Sigma 85mm.
The reviews say they are both good but I trust you lot more. Anybody use either or both of these babies? Any good? On a cropper?
Last edited: